(1) G = 92.00 + 1.67A + 0.5833B + 0.25C − 1.333D − 0.5AB − 0.75AC − 1.5AD + 0.5BC + 0.25BD + 0.25CD − 12.17A 2 − 4.27B 2 − 4.92C 2 − 3.54D 2 It can be known from the analysis of variance table that the F of the regression model is 9.13 and p < 0.0001, indicating that the established regression model is extremely significant and suggesting that the fitting degree of the established quadratic multivariate regression equation is good.
Due to the size of the UK Biobank cohort, this amounts to 4148 heterozygotes and 203 homozygotes for this SNP, and thus the P -value of the effect was extremely significant (8.2 × 10 -40 ).
A probability ( P ) value less than 0.01 was considered statistically extremely significant different, while a P value less than 0.05 was considered significant different.
For the TFs whose targets were only predicted from computation in mESnet, the/’ overlap between the predicted and the ChIP-seq the ChIP-seq targets was extremely significant (the least significant P -value was still 4.1 × 10 − 17 ).
The difference was considered as significant or extremely significant when the p -value below 0.05. 5.
P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant, and P < 0.01 was considered extremely significant.
p values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant, while p values < 0.01 were considered extremely significant.
Extremely significant and positive correlation was found between GI and DNC in spike, whereas negative correlation was detected between GI and DNC in leaf, stem and sheath.
The analysis of variance indicated that genotype, environment, year, and their interactions exhibited extremely significant effects on SS.
Next, through statistical analysis, it is found that there are extremely significant differences in the tongue features between the clusters, which proves that the differences between the clusters are extremely large.
Statistical differences were considered to be extremely significant when p < 0.01. 3.
p < 0.05 and p < 0.01 were considered to be significant and extremely significant, respectively. 5.
The results of our study highlighted the fact that an extremely significant proportion of the control group 22.5% (9 cases) presented excessive epicardial adipose tissue, pathological epicardial adipose tissue was also found in 52.5% (21 cases) of the death group recorded by SCD ( Figure 4 ). 4.
A statistical comparison between specific and non-specific binding using unpaired T test analysis suggested extremely significant signal with P value equivalent to 0.0001.
p < 0.05 was used to indicate significance, and p < 0.01 was regarded as extremely significant. 3.
Among the three elements, calcium showed extremely significant partial correlation with ten elements (P, Mg, S, Fe, Mn, Cu, Mo, Al, Cr, and Sr), in which P, Mo, Al, and Cr were negatively correlated with Ca while rest were positively correlated.
A value of p < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant, and values of p < 0.01 or p < 0.001 indicated extremely significant differences. 5.
The p values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant, whereas p values < 0.01 were considered extremely significant.
The model was established using eqn (13) : 13 Y = 94.50 + 7.88 X 1 + 5.63 X 2 + 4.88 X 3 + 2.62 X 1 X 2 + 3.55 X 1 X 3 + 2.60 X 2 X 3 − 8.03 X 1 2 + 0.23 X 2 2 − 59.79 X 3 2 As shown in Table S4, † from the analysis of the variance test, P < 0.0001, indicating that the regression model equation is extremely significant and established model meaningful.
Statistical significance was considered at a p-value of <0.05, while a p-value of <0.01 indicated an extremely significant difference.
Specifically, there was an extremely significant correlation between the variation in DB content and the presence of DEMs 6-hydroxymelatonin, L-ornithine, Asp-Phe methyl ester, 4-hydroxy-3-methylbenzoic acid, β-cortolone, 3-methylcrotonylglycine, coenzyme Q2, 4-[2-(4-chlorophenyl) diaz-1-enyl]-2-methyl-6-(piperidinomethyl) phenol and D-threose, and significantly correlated with metabolites cytidine and 1-palmitoyl-Sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine, etc.
Statistical analysis comparing two means were performed using the two-way ANOVA or Student’s t -test [ P -values < 0.05 (*) and <0.01 ( ** ) were considered to correspond to significant and extremely significant differences, respectively].
All data were first log-transformed to meet the requirement of normality for ANOVA and then analyzed using one-way ANOVA, where p < 0.05 represented significant differences and p < 0.01 represented extremely significant differences. 3.
The FCGS fusion protein-1 group produced significantly higher antibody levels, higher than those of the control group on the 14th day after immunization ( p < 0.01), and the difference was extremely significant on the 21st day ( Figure 5B ).
The decrease in the consumption of both proteins and lipids and their respective energy calculation in the CS and SS groups were due to consumed postnatal sucrose with extremely significant effect (corresponding to 49% of the variance in said variables), as well as significant differences were observed between groups.