“extremely significant”

A level of p < 0.05 (*) was considered significant, while p < 0.01 (**) or p < 0.001 (***) was considered extremely significant.

Water quality modeling and prediction have become extremely significant in the control of water pollution, environmental protection, and the decrease of water-related disorders [ 7 , 8 , 9 ].

The spike number was affected ( P < 0.01) by year and sowing date, and the interaction was extremely significant ( Table 4 ).

Carbonylation increases aggregability of negatively charged proteins as well, but to a somewhat lower extent (ln(ν mut /ν wt ) = 2.39 ± 0.73 for Lys to Asa, and ln(ν mut /ν wt ) = 2.87 ± 0.73 for Arg to Gsa), which is still extremely significant.

A value of p < .01 indicates extremely significant difference. 3.

The results are shown as the mean ± standard error (SE), and P < 0.05 and P < 0.01 were used as the criteria to judge significant and extremely significant differences.

Vulnerable individuals were identified if they showed extremely significant attentional lapses after sleep deprivation, while resilient individuals had a less pronounced decrease. 11 , 12 A recent study that comprehensively compared methods classifying individual resiliency and vulnerability to sleep deprivation using the PVT metric indicated that the approaches using laps

Subjects falling under the 12 to 16 years age group were found to have higher Calculus Index, Gingival Index, and Plaque Index scores when compared to younger age patients with extremely significant P value (<0.01).

Western blot data analysis results showed that the expression of IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α, PTGS2, ATF6, PERK, GRP78, BAX, Bcl-2, Caspase3, and Caspase8 in the CM group was significantly or extremely significant compared with the NC group, and the protein level was consistent with the gene level, and the change trend was roughly consistent with that of MAC-T treated with LTA ( Figure 5 D,F,H).

Effect on Fish Growth and Feed Conversion Accelerated somatic growth is extremely significant for fish during early ontogenesis, as it increases the individual competitiveness and survival rates after wintering [ 110 ].

The difference was significant when p ≤ 0.05, and extremely significant when p < 0.01. 3.

Differences were considered statistically significant when P < 0.05, and P < 0.01 was considered extremely significant.

For AM plants, there was no significant difference in the effects of type I and II, but the effects of type III on plant N:P ratio were extremely significant (+0.1061%, Figure 2 c).

The probability value p < 0.05 represented significant difference, and the probability value p < 0.01 represented extremely significant difference.

The impact of exogenous Si coupled with B was more significant in lessening Al stress in date palm by exhibiting extremely significant growth attributes compared to individual Si and B treatment.

Statistical significance were labeled as * P < 0.05 and ** P < 0.01 for significant and extremely significant, respectively.

In addition, there were extremely significant differences in the degree of shattering between Hap1-carrying materials and materials carrying other haplotypes ( Figure 7 b).

No significant difference (n.s.): p > 0.05, * p < 0.05 was considered to have differences, ** p < 0.005 was considered to have significant differences, *** p < 0.001 was considered to have extremely significant differences.

The effect of electroacupuncture stimulation of the pudendal nerve in patients with symptoms remaining after acupuncture stimulation of lumbar muscle is extremely significant.

When the pressure is less than 1 MPa, its increase is extremely significant ( Fig. 10 a).

If FDR ≤ 0.05 and FDR ≤ 0.01, we assumed that there was significant enrichment or extremely significant enrichment of this GO function.

* P < 0.05 and ** P < 0.01 indicate significant and extremely significant differences, respectively.

The p -value reflects the confidence level of the model; p < 0.05 means that the corresponding factor has a significant effect on the response value, and p < 0.0001 indicates that the effect is extremely significant.

In the statistical tests performed, it was considered as levels of significance, the values of 0.05 (significant) and of 0.01 (extremely significant).

Compared to the control groups, the expression level of LvIGFBP1 showed an extremely significant decrease when the dosage of ds IGFBP1 injected into individuals was 10 μg ( Figure 5 A).