“extremely significant”

p < 0.05 indicated a significant difference, while p < 0.01 indicated an extremely significant difference.

Results were represented as mean ± SEM (∗ denotes P < 0.05, significant difference; ∗∗ or ∗∗∗ denotes P < 0.01 or P < 0.001, extremely significant difference). 3.

The exploration of treatment strategies for infertility of the patients with PCOS associated with diabetes is extremely significant for these females.

Therefore, the study of biomarkers for expeditious diagnosis and treatment, including age or sex factors, is extremely significant.

A P -value less than 0.05 was considered a significant difference, and less than 0.01 was considered extremely significant.

Bombyx mori is an extremely significant model organism for insect biology, in particular, and other life sciences, in general.

*: p < 0.05 indicates significant difference; **: p < 0.01 indicates that the difference is significant; ***: p < 0.001 indicates that the difference is extremely significant. 3.

The expression distribution of the three subtypes of characteristic gene scores in metastatic samples, primary samples and paracancerous samples were analyzed, and the three subtype characteristic gene scores showed extremely significant expression differences in different samples types ( Figure 3A ).

ANOVA testing proved that the observed differences were not random, with P values below 0.0001 (‘extremely significant’).

p < 0.01 was considered extremely significant.

The concentrations of CCL17, CCL22 and CCL27 chemokines correlates with the activity of the disease process itself, which is extremely significant and logical.

* P < 0.05 and ** P < 0.01 were considered significant and extremely significant differences, respectively.

If the fold change (log2) was >1.5 or <−1.5 and the P-value was ≤0.01, then it was considered to indicate an extremely significant difference in expression levels.

In our study, we found that most bacteria, such as Gemmatimonadaceae , RB41 , Rokubacteriales , Gaiella , Vicinamibacteraceae , Rubrobacter , and JG30-KF-CM45 , demonstrated an extremely significant positive correlation with pH, whereas Vicinamibacteraceae , RB41 , Gemmatimonadaceae , and Rubrobacter were significantly negative correlated with SOC.

Statistical analysis was carried out by one-way ANOVA test to analyze differences between the controls and treated where p<0.05 is considered significant and p < 0.01 extremely significant. 3.

Differences are considered significant (*) if p -value is less than or equal to 0.00625, very significant (**) if less than or equal to 0.001 and extremely significant (***) if less than or equal to 0.0001. 5.

All results are expressed as means ± SD; p < 0.05 indicates the difference was significant, and p < 0.01 indicates that the difference was extremely significant. 3.

The P 1 value of Sunken Tongue is 0.000, which shows that it has an extremely significant statistical difference between points.

Two-way ANOVA showed that AMF and soil type had extremely significant effects on maize plant height, root and shoot biomass, and mycorrhizal dependence.

All experimental data are presented as mean ± SE (standard error of the mean): P ≤ 0.05 indicates that the difference was significant; P ≤ 0.01 indicates that the difference was extremely significant. 3 Results 3.1 Expression levels of BMPR1B in different tissues during the follicular phase The expression characteristics of the BMPR1B gene are shown in Fig. 1.

Values of P < 0.05 were considered statistically significant, and values of P < 0.01 were considered extremely significant. 3.

ANOVA of regression equation coefficients showed that the effect of ultrasonic time, the solid:liquid ratio on quinoa protein extraction rate, the interaction terms AB, and the interaction terms BC, were extremely significant; the effect of ultrasonic temperature on the quinoa protein extraction rate and the interaction terms AC was insignificant.

In this study, correlation analysis was performed on 14 indices, and multiple sets of significant or extremely significant correlations were identified, reflecting the results reported by Ning et al. that there is a correlation between polyphenols and flavonoids [ 60 ].

Additionally, soil organic carbon (SOC) had an extremely significant positive correlation with MBN, while total nitrogen (TN) showed extremely significant positive correlations with both MBN and soluble organic nitrogen (SON).

Several pairwise comparisons showed extremely significant differences between models ( Table 2 ).