“extremely significant”

P values less than 0.05 was present as significant difference, whereas values less than 0.01 or 0.001 were considered extremely significant difference.

Moreover, being exposed to elevated CO 2 concentration for only a short time, it was hard to generate extremely significant effects.

P < 0.01 was considered extremely significant.

60 Toxic effects on phytohormones Plant growth hormones are extremely significant contributors influencing the growth and crop yield in different environmental circumstances such as stress.

The levels of all 11 phenolic acids and THBA, THCA, and TPA showed extremely significant negative correlations with the high copper concentrations.

The activity of C 4 photosynthetic enzymes and expression of key genes are extremely significant in enabling sweet maize plants to withstand nicosulfuron stress at a photosynthetic physiological level with different degrees of resistance to this herbicide [ 19 ].

the anterior regions of inferior meatus or nasal valve) that are often extremely significant from clinical and QoL standpoints 22 , 25 .

A recent study involving 5,092 British twins aged from 8 to 11 years revealed that genetic influences were extremely significant in BMI (77%) and abdominal circumference, whereby 60% of abdominal adiposity heritability was from the same genes in BMI, and the remaining 40% were attributed to different genetic factors [ 74 ].

p < .05 and .01 was considered statistically significant and extremely significant, respectively. 3.

Statistical analysis The Tukey-Kramer test of the software package Graph Pad InStat v.3.06 (32 bit) was used to study the significance levels of the different assays, for which P < 0.05 (*) was taken to be significant and P < 0.001 (***) extremely significant.

The significance levels were set at p < 0.05 (significant) and p < 0.01 (extremely significant) relative to the LPS group. 3.

Specifically, the expression level of CHS gene in YS was approximately 3 times that in GS, exhibiting an extremely significant phenotype-specific difference.

Based on a confidence level of 0.05, the Mann-Kendall test results were divided into nine grades: extremely significant increase, significant increase, slight increase, insignificant increase, no change, insignificant decrease, slight decrease, significant decrease and extremely significant decrease.

An extremely significant difference was found between these two plant groups with the control.

ANOVA analysis ANOVA was used to evaluate the quality of the fitted model ( Table 2 ), the p value of the model is 0.0003, less than 0.01, which is extremely significant, and the p value of the lack of fit is 0.5497, which is not significant.

By comparing the reported research results, the CPAM-Dia/SA-La gel composite is confirmed to have extremely significant adsorption advantages for dyes. 2.3.5.

A p -value of less than 0.05 was considered as significant, a p -value of less than 0.01 was considered as highly significant, and a p -value of less than 0.001 was considered as extremely significant. 5.

P < 0.01 was considered to be extremely significant.

The statistical results for exercise time are expressed in Figure 2 : Figure 2 indicates that there is an extremely significant difference between boys and girls in the exercise time of each physical exercise.

4 , 5 Even though great advances have been achieved in lung cancer screening, diagnostics, and therapy since the last century, it is extremely significant to understand the application of NSCLC therapies and outcomes in clinical practice. 6 Currently, platinum drugs are recognized as one of the accesses to prolong survival of patients with advanced NSCLC. 7 It interferes with the DNA replication by the electrophilic effect of Pt (II) and DNA to for

A p value <0.05 was considered significant difference, and p < 0.01 was considered to be an extremely significant difference between BA-treated mice and the control.

Abstract With the development of portable EEG acquisition systems, the collected EEG has gradually changed from being multi-channel to few-channel or single-channel, thus the removal of single-channel EEG signal artifacts is extremely significant.

The following conventions were used: significant, ∗ p < 0.05; very significant, ∗∗ p < 0.01; and extremely significant, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001. 3.

An average SNP-index and Δ(SNP-index) of each position were calculated via 200 kb sliding window with 100 kb step, windows out of 95% and 99% confidence intervals of the Δ(SNP-index) were treated as significant and extremely significant windows respectively ( Abe et al., 2012 ).

In all statistical analyses, p < 0.05, 0.001 < p < 0.01, and p < 0.001 were considered significant, very significant, and extremely significant, respectively. 3.