Such increases became highly significant in P20 cells ( p < 0.001) and extremely significant and peaked in value in cells at P25 and P30 ( p < 0.0001) when compared to those for P5 cells.
← all phrases
“extremely significant”
In the literature
Statistical significance levels are categorized as follows: extremely significant (****, p < 0.0001), extremely significant (***, p = 0.0001 to 0.001), very significant (**, p = 0.001 to 0.01), significant (*, p = 0.01 to 0.05), and not significant (ns, p ≥ 0.05). 3.
The distance between channels have extremely significant difference between white-red (p = 0.0001), highly significant between blue-green (p = 0.0127), blue-red (p = 0.002), green-red (p = 0.0014) but no significant difference comparing white-blue (p = 0.15), white-green (0.14).
The difference of ciliostasis was extremely significant between aYN vaccinated groups and unvaccinated groups ( P < 0.0001). 3.2.3.
Significance values are denoted by asterisks as defined by GraphPad Prism version 6.04: ****extremely significant (p < 0.0001); ***extremely significant (0.001 ≤ p ≤ 0.0001); **very significant (0.01 ≤ p ≤ 0.001); *significant (0.05 ≤ p ≤ 0.01).
This difference was considered extremely significant (U = 3; U′ = 172, p value < 0.0001). 3.3.
The addition of peppermint essential oil as a penetration promoter was confirmed to be statistically extremely significant ( p < 0.0001) in most cases (HPMC, MC, HEC, NaCMC, and HPC).
41 As shown by the results, treatment by free DOX (G 4 ) caused an extremely significant cardiotoxicity as compared to normal control (G 1 ) ( P < 0.0001).
An unpaired t test (for two-groups comparison) and ANOVA test (for multi-group comparison) were used in statistical analysis ( ∗ , p < 0.05, significant; ∗∗ , p < 0.01, very significant; ∗∗∗ , p < 0.001, highly significant; ∗∗∗∗ , p < 0.0001, extremely significant; ns, p > 0.05, not significant).
In this test, it was observed that treatment had an extremely significant effect on the ability of the mice to recognize the novel object ( p <0.0001).
The extremely significant higher signals ( P = 0.0001) were observed in the tumor regions for one lectin recognizing α2,3-sialic acid (MAL-I) and another lectin for (GlcNAc) n and/or poly- N -acetyllactosamine (polyLacNAc; STL), where |FC(log2)| were 1.7 and 0.6, respectively ( Figure 6A and Table 2 ).
The mathematical models of Pb 2+ and Cd 2+ were extremely significant (p < 0.0001), and the determination coefficients were 0.9952 and 0.9887, respectively, indicating that these two models can explain of the change of response values, and provided a perfect fit of response surface.
By 24 h, frankincense, lemon, lemongrass, patchouli, peppermint, geranium, palmarosa, and sage EOs exhibited a certain level of toxicity, indicating an extremely significant difference compared to the control ( p ≤ 0.0001).
The differences between these slopes were extremely significant ( F = 368.13, P < 0.0001).
Sea cucumbers treated with AjKiss1b-10 for 40 days exhibited weight loss (p=0.0583, Tukey’s multiple comparisons test, as shown in Figure 7E ) and extremely significant intestinal degeneration (p=0.0001, Tukey’s multiple comparisons test, as shown in Figure 7F,G ), which are characteristic phenotypes of aestivating A. japonicus ( Wang et al., 2015 ).
The infection rates of different species of parasites showed extremely significant differences ( p = 0.0001).
Nevertheless, the enhanced resilience of CoQ10-supplemented membranes was still extremely significant at this higher temperature (15% CL vs. 15% CL-CoQ10, p < 0.0001).
An extremely significant difference in OS was detected between the two groups ( P < 0.0001, Figure 4F ).
The differences between slopes were extremely significant ( P < 0.0001), suggesting that the time-related linear increase in pressure was exacerbated in the simulated sialolithiasis group.
The difference between means was extremely significant (F= 34.2, p<0. 0001).
The fitted model was extremely significant ( F = 61.47 and p < 0.0001).
Nonparametric ANOVA was extremely significant ( P < 0.0001).
Extremely significant differences ( p < 0.0001) were demonstrated by ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post-hoc test between the concentrations of 0–1.95 μg/mL ( Figure 4 A).
Overall, the difference was extremely significant ( P < 0.0001).
The analysis of variance of the response surface revealed that the model was extremely significant ( p < 0.0001), the lack of fit was not significant ( p > 0.05), the correlation coefficient R 2 was 0.9816, and the adjusted determination coefficients R adj 2 was 0.9632 ( Table 2 ).