“extremely significant”

After Duncan multi-range test, p < 0.05 means there were significant differences among the samples, p < 0.01 means there were extremely significant differences among the samples. 5.

Statistical significance was determined using predefined thresholds: * p -value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant, suggesting the results were unlikely to occur by chance; ** p -value < 0.01 indicated high significance, providing stronger evidence against the null hypothesis; *** p -value < 0.001 was considered strongly significant, reflecting very high confidence in the results; and p-value ≤ 0.0001 was considered extremely significant, indicating exceptional statistical certainty.

The two-sided P -value is <0.0001, considered extremely significant.

The difference seems to be extremely significant.

P < 0.05 was considered significant; P < 0.01 and P < 0.001 were considered extremely significant.

When p < 0.05, the difference was considered statistically significant; when p < 0.01, it was considered extremely significant.

L1-induced raise in ALT and AST level are extremely significant compared to Ir1 treatment.

Also, the lower probability value ( p < 0.0001) also signifies that the model is extremely significant, and the difference in response can be explained by the regression equation.

Further, the number of active “peer-to-peer” or sharing platforms in the Europe Union in 2017 was around 500, of which at least 4% were considered to be extremely significant, as they received more than 100,000 visits a day, generating revenues of more than $4,000 million and facilitating transactions of more than $25,000 million (European Commission 2017 ).

Their cross-validation residual analysis of variance (CV-ANOVA p <0.001) indicated extremely significant differences.

In particular, extremely significant increases in all the above indicators were observed in cells treated with LPS concentrations ≥100 ng/mL, as compared to cells not stimulated with LPS.

The P values ​< ​0.05 (∗), <0.01 (∗∗), <0.001 (∗∗∗) and ns were considered significant, very significant, extremely significant, and non-significant respectively. 3.

Significant differences were determined using the p -value, with thresholds of p < 0.05 for significant differences and p < 0.005 for extremely significant differences. 5.

The authors elaborated the extremely significant conclusion that transarterial embolization (TAE) plus two-stage hepatectomy might be the optimal treatment for spontaneous rupture of hepatocellular carcinoma (RHCC) patients, whose overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) aren’t significantly different compared with non-ruptured hepatocellular carcinoma (NHCC) patients undergoing hepatectomy, and had a better prognosis than other treatment, including TAE alone and one-stage hepatectomy.

Hence, accurately forecasting the price is very important not only for providing an effective factor for implementing energy policy but also for playing an extremely significant role in government strategic planning.

TMUV and all the agonists led to extremely significant upregulation of goose IFITM3 in comparison with the PBS group ( Figure 6(b) ).

p < 0.05 represented a significant difference, and p < 0.01 represented an extremely significant difference. 2.5.

A probability ( P ) value less than 0.05 and 0.01 is considered statistically significant and extremely significant respectively.

The level of statistical significance was highlighted with asterisks in the figures as follows: P > 0.05, not significant; P < 0.05 ( * ) was considered statistically significant; P < 0.01 ( ** ) was considered very significant; and P < 0.001 ( *** ), extremely significant.

A * p value < 0.05 means significant difference, ** p < 0.01 means extremely significant difference.

The significance tests of the three models were p < 0.001, indicating extremely significant and high reliability of the three models.

According to our study, the ratio of the nephron and recipient’s metabolism demands had an extremely significant linear correlation with the early renal function in transplant recipients.

Potential of QUR and MEX on the level of cerebral amino acids (nmol/ml) and Fisher’s ratio In contrast to the non-intoxicated animals, synfat-intoxication produced a marked increase in AAA, tyrosine, phenylalanine, alanine, tryptophan, isoleucine, and taurine levels, as well as an extremely significant alteration in Fisher’s ratio, accompanied by levels of histidine, proline, and citrulline ( Tables 2 and Fig 8 ).

A P value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant (indicated by * in the figures), and a P value of <0.01 was considered extremely significant (indicated by ** in the figures).

A P -adjust value < 0.05, and Log2 (fold change of Sample1/Sample2) for a gene > 1 or < − 1 were used as the screening cutoffs for determining extremely significant differential gene expression between paired samples.