“difference was apparent”

When we compared 25(OH)D levels in patients with or without CT abnormalities, no significant difference was apparent (55nmol/L vs. 54 nmol/L, p = 0.83).

This sex-specific difference was apparent regardless of treatment group as observed by a null sex by treatment interaction, F (1,52) =0.038, P =0.846.

While no temporal difference was apparent for the pre-stimulus peaks (t 15 = 0.07, P = 0.942), the timing of the post-stimulus ERP peaks differed significantly (t 15 = 3.00, P = 0.009 for the negative peak; t 15 = 2.31, P = 0.036 for the positive peak).

However, no significant difference was apparent for age at first words ( Wilcoxon Z = 343.5, p = 0.95).

No significant difference was apparent between groups ( P = 1.000).

No significant difference was apparent between the no sound and neutral sound condition ( p = 1).

Yet, exercise training had no effect on muscle mass in TG mice, even though the exercise intervention was started before a BW (and presumably, muscle mass) difference was apparent in TG mice.

In addition, when comparing the quantitative values between macroscopic grades, the difference was apparent in the lower-grade groups.

This difference was apparent both in the case of non-pretreated FeO-DEX as well as NC pretreated with native or h.i. serum.

3 b); no significant difference was apparent between groups II and IV, thus confirming that the HBBM does not lead to abnormal (delay nor unwanted acceleration of) fibrosis.

However, after two weeks of differentiation, the difference was apparent, especially between days 14 and 21 ( Figure 6 and Figure S4 ).

However, no significant difference was apparent between those sequences harbouring multiple mutations and controls (data not shown).

polyploidization RNA-seq dwarf plant hormone hybrid sweetgum National Forestry and Grassland Administration Promotion Project of China 2020133102 In stage I, the height of tetraploids only increased by 1.93 mm, while the diploids grew rapidly; in stage II, a significant difference was apparent ( Figure 1B ).

However, when Groups 3 (PRBC + FFP) and 4 (FWB) were combined to form a “blood group” (increasing the power of the analysis), a significant difference was apparent between the saline and the “blood group”.

This reduction was reflected in reduced gamma band power in both VP and mPFC during S- compared to S+ trials ( Figures 7 A and 7B), whereas no such difference was apparent in AC ( Figure 7 C).

In addition, a gender-based difference was apparent, but only for the responses to physical disgust elicitors [14] .

Little difference was apparent in percent of positively skewed activity patterns (7.4% to 11.5%).

The greatest difference was apparent for multi-crypt ACFs, which were abundant in hGAS mice but completely suppressed in hGAS/GPR56 –/– mice (Figure 6E ).

However, the difference was apparent after 8 weeks.

No statistically significant difference was apparent in contraceptive method mix between intervention and comparison facilities, nor between pre- and postintegrated service delivery (data not shown).

Further, for interspecific contests where a size difference was apparent, in addition to recording which species lost the contest, whether the contest initiator and losing individual was larger or smaller than their opponent was also recorded.

This difference was apparent in our samples: the variability in secondary metabolite composition, dominated by glycoalkaloids in our samples, was greater aboveground than belowground, and beetle performance was reduced in the resistant line regardless of nematode presence.

However, a distinct difference was apparent with regard to cell cycle phase.

When examining the two dose administrations in isolation, this difference was apparent after the first but not the second dose.

Higher socioeconomic status (SES) was inversely associated with BA, but a sex-specific difference was apparent.