“difference was apparent”

Urine protein levels prior to and following treatment Following treatment, the urine protein level in the spironolactone group had significantly decreased compared with that prior to treatment (P<0.05), whereas no significant difference was apparent in the control group (P>0.05).

However, no significant difference was apparent between the BMP-2 and the sham groups ( p > 0.05), indicating that BMP-2 alone did not significantly enhance osteogenesis ( Figure 4 A).

No significant difference was apparent in Good's Coverage index between HCs and RA (98.99% versus 98.59, P > 0.05, Figure 1(e) ).

The amount of dextran entering the animal was very small even when the dextran was added before cutting and the average fluorescence value was not significantly higher than in other groups; no significant difference was apparent by ANOVA (F = 3.236; p = 0.05219; Fig. 7 e).

No corresponding significant difference was apparent for CRT and histone H3 levels [1.00 vs. 6.52 (P=0.053) and 1.00 vs. 1.26 (P=0.60), respectively].

23.4 ± 1.6 psi, P < 0.05), and the difference was apparent during extension (70.3 ± 9.0 psi vs. 58.9 ± 5.6 psi, P = 0.063).

However, when the horizontal and interactive were compared, no evidence of difference was apparent (p=0.065).

Compared to the advanced stage, the difference in CMT in the atrophic stage was significant ( p < 0.001); nevertheless, the difference was apparent in the severe stage ( p = 0.068).

A borderline significant difference was apparent in the total eye symptom score (mean diff ± SE: −12.5 ± 7.5, p = 0.07) with the active group tending to improve more than the placebo group ( Table 4b and Figure 3 ).

It is rather difficult to characterize this as an effect of “aging,” since the difference was apparent at 18 weeks of age (compared with 8 weeks of age in the Young-Young and Young-Old conditions), and did not become statistically greater ( P = 0.08) when Old-Old mice were retested at 12 months of age.

With a main effect of groups ( F (3,50) = 9.685, p < .0001; η 2 = 0.91), post hoc comparisons using Dunnett’s T3 procedure showed that although no VSA difference was apparent between the SNHL and NH groups ( F (1, 31) = 6.172, p = .080), both the COND and MIX groups exhibited significantly more compressed VSAs than the NH group did (NH vs COND: F (1, 35) = 20.736, p = .002; NH vs MIX: F (1, 34) = 13.965, p = .010).

Of note, no significant difference was apparent between patients with low-volume + cT4 and high-volume+≤cT3 ( P =0.1345).

No significant difference was apparent between these two groups (Fisher's exact test: P = .173).

As evident in the demographic data and questionnaire results presented in Table 1 , no significant difference was apparent in terms of gender (χ 2 [1]=1.60, p =0.206), age ( t [31]=0.59, p =0.559), and educational level ( t [31]=−0.90, p =0.377) between the waitlist control and MBSR groups.

No significant difference was apparent (p = 0.2212) in viral load in saliva between 14 and 21 dpi ( Fig 3 ).

No significant between-group difference was apparent (P = 0.235) ( Fig. 1 ).

After comparing the last two models, no statistical difference was apparent (Δχ 2 = 1.395, Δ df = 1 , p = 0.237), so we accepted the model A4 as the final model since it showed a better parsimony fit index (AIC = 111.666).

No significant difference was apparent in first choice frequency between the correct corner, C, and its geometrically equivalent corner R (F(1,9) = 1.569 P = 0.242), indicating that the disorientation procedure was effective and that bumblebees did not rely on any extra- or intra-enclosure featural cues.

No significant difference was apparent for neutral human and neutral avatar expressions (exact Wilcoxon test: z = −1.19, P = 0.244).

No significant genotypic difference was apparent between male WT and GRM5 AA/AA mice ( t (22) = 1.19, p = 0.25; Fig. 3 A’’ ).

However, no significant difference was apparent for years 5–10 ( P = 0.255).

Prognosis was particularly bad for patients with lesions CLINICAL FEATURES OF SKIN MELANOMA of the trunk, and at this site a sex difference was apparent, although this might have occurred by chance (X2 = 1.25, P = 0.26).

Results Gradual difference in right and left shoulder skin temperature was observed with the timing of measurements but no significant difference was apparent, i.e. dominant side 34.9 ± 0.8°C, non-dominant side 34.9 ± 0.9°C ( P = 0.28).

Data regarding the oxidation state of glutathione were not entirely conclusive: the A‐strain showed a significantly higher concentration of the reduced isoform of L‐glutathione (ratio 1.30, P adj = 0.015, Welch's t ‐test; Appendix Fig S3 , Dataset EV3 ), but no significant difference was apparent in the ratio of the reduced to oxidised isoforms, where the median for the A‐strains was 2.01 vs. 1.89 for the T‐strain ( P = 0.289, Welch's t ‐test).

No significant difference was apparent between across and within hemifield accuracy, p = 0.29).