“difference was apparent”

Although no significant difference was apparent between the mammary IgA+ PCs of the two genotypes, the IgA levels in breast milk were higher in BALB/c mice. 4 Pups nursed by BALB/c mice, independent of their birth mothers, show higher fecal IgA levels and IgA+ bacterial proportions, which can also be transmitted through generations. 4 Furthermore, the colonic RORγ+ Treg level in mice nursed by Igha −/− BALB/c mice was higher than that in mice nursed by WT BALB/c mice, independent of their birth mother.

However, no major difference was apparent between the groups except at week 19 in the high fat group, where the KO mice had lower fasting glucose compared to the WT mice ( Fig. 2 A).

The second difference was apparent during anaphase, when sister chromatids are segregating, and centrosomes begin to separate.

When single-cell examination analysis of Prox1 and Pdx1 fluorescence intensities was performed at E8.5, no obvious difference was apparent between control and Robo1/2 KO ventral foregut endoderm (Supplementary Fig. 3a ).

The sex difference was not significant with the lower tumour dose. Closed colony mice.-As with the C3H mice the survival time was greater with the lower tumour dose, the difference being approximately 12 days (0.001 > P). No sex difference was apparent.

This minimal difference was apparent in the IQR of −5 to 2 μm with a range from −17 to 12 μm.

The biggest difference was apparent for deletion of CSF1R , which was more prevalent in boys than in girls (13.6% vs. 0.0%), but this difference was not statistically significant ( p = 0.05237 without correction for multiple comparisons).

Cortical Adaptation A significant pattern of cortical adaptation in the SEF measure was apparent in the present cohort for both the blind and pulsed orocutaneous pacifier stimulation conditions, and a significant difference was apparent between the two conditions as well ( Figure 2 ).

Although B6NJ females tended to respond more in the inactive hole than males at higher MA concentrations, no sex difference was apparent in this substrain ( Figure 3 B, right) (sex×concentration ANOVA, all p ’s > 0.12).

In this series, while certain histologies were associated with residue, no significant difference was apparent between LGG and HGG.

At this time postsurgery, however, this difference was apparent only in the trochlear groove defects, but not in the femoral condyle defects ( Fig. 4 C and SI Appendix , Fig.

This difference was apparent not only for PBP1 but also for GOBP1.

No statistically significant difference was apparent between the two groups in the following characteristics at baseline: age, body mass, height, BMI, fat-free mass, and body fat percentage.

No significant difference was apparent in the likelihood of being surveyed on any of these baseline characteristics, suggesting that attrition is largely “at random”.

No significant difference was apparent in health-care-seeking attitudes.

No such difference was apparent for the fish assemblages, reflecting the lack of significance in the analysis.

Although less difference was apparent when comparing the reductive k cat / K m of P. burseri and P. somniferum DRR(REPI), and the oxidative k cat / K m of P. lasiothrix DRR(REPI) and P. somniferum DRR(REPI) (Table 1 , S5 )).

Between the groups a significant difference was apparent in the reduction of the TIS when measured at 1 week and 6 weeks.

This difference was apparent in both groups and did not differ between groups.

A more pronounced difference was apparent in the distribution of the Ly-49D activation receptor with Ly-49H.

This difference was apparent only when low doses of oells were used.

Although this study noted no substantial disparity between QMix and the EDTA solution, a pronounced efficacy difference was apparent between them.

In particular, a large difference was apparent between the RNA and DNA G4 tetraplex substrates.

When studying ORs for plaque development in any of the analyzed territories in each group in a disaggregated variable of total hours sitting time per day, at the detail provided by the collecting instrument (hourly detail), a steep difference was apparent at the 9 h threshold ( Figure 1 ).

No obvious difference was observed for each low-temperature treatment after 1 day of recovery for freezing by 1 or 2 days, but after 5 days of recovery, the difference was apparent at −14°C and −12°C for 1-day and 2-day treatments, respectively.