“difference was apparent”

However, no sex difference was apparent in most tissues with respect to UGT2B17 or UGT2B28 expression apart from UGT2B17 in the liver (higher in males than females) and in the intestine and colon (higher in females than males) (Supplementary Fig. 2 ) [ 8 , 9 ].

This difference was apparent for youth pitchers (RHD 9±9° vs.

However, no such significant difference was apparent between the males with AD and male controls.

3 it was found that the risk of cancer was reduced by 24% in gastric bypass patients, when compared to obese controls, though this difference was apparent only in women.

Such a sex difference was apparent in the present study even in mice fed standard laboratory chow, with male mice having a thicker dermis and females a thicker subcutaneous fat layer with larger adipocytes (see also (30)).

Erk phosphorylation in vivo was essentially abolished with either AZD6244 alone, or the AZD6244-SFN combination (Figure 6B, 6D ); whereas SFN alone reduced Erk phosphorylation in only 2 of 6 tumors (Figure 6B ), and no significant difference was apparent across the whole cohort (Figure 6D ).

This difference was apparent at the focal milkweed and weekly survey level.

However, no significant difference was apparent with any of the PDGFs upon T3 stimulation when compared to controls for both cell types.

And, again, the difference was apparent before the first shock presentation (i.e., on the first C conditioning trial), which suggests that an unconditioned response to C was responsible for suppression of responding.

The IAT revealed a more positive attitude of two samples of university students toward younger than older workers although no such attitude difference was apparent in averaged semantic differential scores as an explicit measure.

The wave form of eABR signals in Figure 4b using intracochlear stimulation and Figure 4c using extracochlear stimulation was within the normal neuronal response record modes (sweep = 250); therefore, some difference was apparent.

This difference was apparent from the additional competitive lines between 11B3AG and some members of the brown community on gD2(306t) that were not seen on gD1(306t).

A pooled analysis of four phase III studies in mCRC reported significantly worse PFS and OS outcomes for BRAF -mutant mCRC in comparison with BRAF wild-type mCRC with microsatellite-stable tumors, but no significant difference was apparent between BRAF- mutant and BRAF wild-type mCRC with MSI-high tumors ( 13 ).

,[ 11 ] the gender difference was apparent and significant with respect to the glycemic control, with poor glycemic control being observed more in females (54.3%) than in males (45.6%).

Although no significant difference was apparent, animals in Malambo-Madukani and Malambo-Sanjani had 21.0% (CI: 0.82–1.78) and 2.0% (CI: 0.69–1.52) higher rates of IgG seropositivity than those in Pinyinyi ( Table 2 ).

However, no significant between group difference was apparent regarding support received from participant’s nominated special person. 3.2.

This difference was apparent during the last five recording sessions, but not during the first five recording sessions ( Figure 7—figure supplement 1 ).

The difference was apparent across all 19 electrodes when investigating the individual channels ( Figure 1 ).

Subsequent evaluation of zygotene stage cells suggested the difference was apparent prior to SC formation ( Figure 5 ).

In sharp contrast ( Figure 3A ), no significant difference was apparent in clotting times of plasma samples not containing homogeneized thrombi and incubated with either 5G9 (median 116.3 seconds, IQ range 108.6–150.6 seconds), TBS (median 116.3 seconds, IQ range 109.5–150.2 seconds), 10H10 (median 114.2 seconds, IQ range 107.8–150.2 seconds), or an isotype-matched IgG (median 116.7 seconds, IQ range 108.2–151.1 seconds).

The inflammatory markers were noted to be higher in more severe groups and this difference was apparent on day 1 of presentation.

Moreover, the rate of proliferation was evaluated by CCK-8 and no statistically significant difference was apparent among the cells, regardless of viral infection.

However, a statistical difference was apparent over the 10-year evaluation period (65.2 × 30.6% success rate for single- and multiple-surface restorations, respectively).

Upon conjunctival impression cytology, it was remarkable that no significant difference was apparent between the control and 1-min PI group.

A trend of less body weight loss was noted in KO chimeric mice, although no statistical difference was apparent between the KO and WT groups ( Fig. 7c ).