Barely Significant
← all phrases

“did not reach statistical significance”

111,028 sentences · 111,028 papers · 130,054 search hits before verification

In the literature

Although the effects of age and gender independently did not reach statistical significance in the likelihood of job change, the interaction between these two variables did show a significant effect (F = 3.376; p < 0.05), indicating, for instance, that younger men may be particularly prone to job changes in the short term, while older women are more likely to remain in their current roles.
reported that although the ingestion of 20 g of creatine during 5 days was effective for increasing intramuscular creatine content, the benefits observed on PPO and fatigue resistance compared to a placebo during a repeated sprint protocol did not reach statistical significance ( p =0.05 and p = 0.08, respectively) [ 8 ].
Paired t -tests on the individual classification outcomes revealed that the differences in recall (∆ = 0.008, p = 0.53), precision (∆ = 0.0252, p = 0.047), and accuracy (∆ = 0.008, p = 0.53) between GPT-4 and the supervised NLP did not reach statistical significance ( p < 0.05 across all tests) suggesting that the overall performance of GPT-4 and the supervised NLP model is statistically comparable (when GPT-4 is provided a curated master list).
an increasing trendP > 0.051.0× alphagold
did not reach statistical significanceP > 0.051.0× alphaplainly factual
The results of subgroup analysis are shown in S3 Fig in S1 File : in subgroups such as mechanical ventilation, continuous renal replacement therapy, hypertension, diabetes, vasopressors, INR, and fresh frozen plasma, the mortality risk of the rapidly ascending RDW group (Traj1) was significantly higher than that of the stable low-level group (Traj0) ( P < 0.05); while in subgroups such as age, chronic kidney disease, and Hb, although the mortality risk of the Traj1 group showed an increasing trend, the difference in some subgroups did not reach statistical significance ( P > 0.05), which may be related to the limited statistical power of smaller subgroups and residual confounding.
There were significant increases in frequency in these cells between day 1 and day 22 in the MAP-FA-15 (0.005% to 0.048%, p < 0.001) and MAP-UA-15 (0.002% to 0.047%, p < 0.001) groups, and an increase that did not reach statistical significance in the IM-QIV-15 groups (0.004% to 0.026%, p = 0.05), but again, there were no differences in the MBC frequency in the vaccine groups at day 22 (MAP-FA-15 compared with IM-QIV-15, p > 0.99; MAP-UA-15 compared with IM-QIV-15, p > 0.99; MAP-FA-15 compared with MAP-UA-15, p > 0.99; Fig 8C and Fig 8D ).