Barely Significant
← all phrases

“did not reach statistical significance”

111,028 sentences · 111,028 papers · 130,054 search hits before verification

In the literature

In the RNAseq analysis, infection increased levels of tnf at the one week timepoint, an effect slightly augmented by imatinib, and levels increased further by three weeks, though these differences did not reach statistical significance at the p<0.05 level ( Fig 5B ).
The random-effects model showed an OR of 1.03 (95% CI: 0.97, 1.08) for the effect size of emotional status on readiness for discharge, indicating that the effect size did not reach statistical significance and there was a high degree of heterogeneity between the studies (I 2 = 74%, P =0.05).
Of those with high intent, 43.7% favoured vaccination at their HSCT programme, compared with 29.6% at their GP surgery although these findings did not reach statistical significance (p=0.05).
Survivors with high CRC screening test knowledge were more likely to undergo screening, though this did not reach statistical significance (p=0.05) On multivariate analysis, physician’s recommendation, higher household income and survivors’ perceived need to undergo screening remained significantly correlated with actual CRC screening (OR 7.15 (95% CI 3.00 – 17.1), p<0.001; OR 3.32 (95% CI 1.33- 8.31), p=0.01; OR 7.10 (95% CI 3.08-16.4), p<0.001), whereas education level, family history and high CRC symptom knowledge were no longer significant ( Table 3 ).