Barely Significant
← all phrases

“did not reach statistical significance”

111,028 sentences · 111,028 papers · 130,054 search hits before verification

In the literature

The increase in other AEs did not reach statistical significance: rash (Peto OR, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.3 to 3.77; P-value = 0.03; I 2 = 0%); gastrointestinal AEs (Peto OR, 1.43; 95% CI, 0.55 to 3.72; P-value = 0.46; I 2 = 15.17%); headache (Peto OR, 1.94; 95% CI, 0.65 to 5.78; P-value = 0.23; I 2 = 9.99%); dizziness (Peto OR, 1.32; 95% CI, 0.49 to 3.52; P-value = 0.58; I 2 = 0%); fatigue (Peto OR, 2.13; 95% CI, 0.76 to 5.98; P-value = 0.15; I 2 = 0%); and visual AEs (Peto OR, 1.61; 95% CI, 0.76 to 3.41; P-value = 0.22; I 2 = 0%).
After one year of treatment, patients with EGPA showed numerically higher rates of good or complete response and clinical remission compared with patients with severe asthma; however, these differences did not reach statistical significance (70% vs 55.7% and 30% vs 18.5%, respectively; p = 0.03).
did not reach statistical significanceP -value = 0.030.6× alpha
While the association between the minor alleles of these two nsSNPs and lower BMI did not reach statistical significance among Health ABC white participants ( Table 2 ), the association did reach statistical significance among white females (rs52820871 P -value = 0.03, rs2229616 P -value = 0.01) ( Table 3 ).
For Gemini 3.0 Pro and clinical educator consensus score, mean scores were higher in the traditional style, but these differences did not reach statistical significance after Bonferroni correction ( P =.03 for both; corrected threshold P <.017).
Among those with index dates in 1996–2010, differences between the GD subjects and the controls with a history of specialist‐level psychiatric treatment prior to index date appeared quite large but did not reach statistical significance (23.7% vs. 11.8%, p = 0.03).
Similarly, individuals who were high responders for IgG3 to PfRH5 had a 65% decreased risk of symptomatic falciparum malaria compared to those who were classified as low responders, after adjustment for confounders; there was also a reduced risk of malaria for high IgG1 responders, but this did not reach statistical significance (IgG3: aHR 0.35, CI: 0.17–0.71, p = 0.03; and IgG1 aHR 0.46, CI: 0.16–1.29, p = 0.14) ( Table 2 ).