Barely Significant
← all phrases

“did not quite reach statistical significance”

680 sentences · 680 papers · 750 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.063

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

Increased HR during the third activity (ADOS-2 bubble play) significantly correlated with autistic symptoms ( r = 0.415; p = 0.044), while correlations between ADOS-2 total score and HR during the first activity (ADOS-2 free play; r = 0.368; p = 0.077), second activity (Leiter-R figure ground subscale; r = 0.373, p = 0.073), and fifth activity (ADOS-2 anticipation of a routine with objects; r = 0.368; p = 0.076) did not quite reach statistical significance.
HEK293a-Shh cells treated with Hhat-#2 siRNA co-cultured with C3H10T1/2 cells (ratio 1∶2) for 2 days during day 2–4 of KD, resulted in a C3H10T1/2 response decrease of 32±10% compared to non-targeting siRNA, but this did not quite reach statistical significance.
Author Response: Our apologies as we incorrectly reported our changes in ultrasound muscle thickness as we observed a significant main effect for mid-thigh muscle thickness to increase (p = 0.04) while vastus lateralis (p = 0.12) did not quite reach statistical significance.
Compared to 2012, the odds for unmet dental care needs for current smokers were lower in 2015 (Adjusted Odds Ratio (aOR) = 0.67, 95 % Confidence Interval (CI) = 0.45–1.01), 2017 (aOR = 0.53, 95 % CI = 0.35–0.81), and 2019 (aOR = 0.65, 95 % CI = 0.40–1.05) (p for trend < 0.001), although the differences for 2015 and 2019 (vs 2012) did not quite reach statistical significance.
As demonstrated by a P value of 0.084, the stiffness of the abdominal wall sites repaired with P4HB Plug materials at 6 weeks did not quite reach statistical significance and were only trending toward greater relative stiffness compared to the native abdominal wall. 3.2.5.
Moreover, although SrRan 2 g/day markedly decreased (by about 66%) the cartilage volume loss in the medial plateau, the difference did not quite reach statistical significance but yielded a numerical trend ( P = 0.081, Table 6 ), probably due to the relatively small number of patients in each group.