“close to the level of significance”

In the pons of Hoxa5 cKO, Calb1 was the only candidate for which the downregulation was close to the level of significance ( p -value 0.0519), but the level of Zic1 was also reduced in Hoxa5 cKO samples compared to Hoxa5 control, although it did not reach the significance ( p -value 0.169) ( Figure 3B and Table 1 ).

In group II, this status was relatively close to the level of significance.

The 95% CrI of the interaction coefficient for TF was close to the level of significance, suggesting that all 3 interventions (HFNC, CPAP, and BiPAP) may be more effective than COT in infants.

All these results were not statistically significant; however, the related p -values are particularly close to the level of significance of 0.05 in comparison with the equivalent results of the control group ( Table 3 , p -value: 0.27–0.39), suggesting that the promising results reported in the experimental group were potentially caused by the biofeedback.

Although the P-value for tumor diameter was slightly above 0.05 (0.058), it was still close to the level of significance.

However, as p is close to the level of significance, and to further scrutinize the results, univariate testing was inspected (e.g., Lautenbach et al., 2016 ).

If more people were included, a statistical difference might have been established because the p value was close to the level of significance for both tests.

For the vast number of subsets, the difference in patient survival between the subgroups remained significant or stayed close to the level of significance obtained for the full data set, although p-values of the log-rank tests increased with increasing number of excluded patients (Fig. 1 C).

SP-A2 P value is close to the level of significance, 0.05475.

In the healthy individuals it resulted approximately close to the level of significance.

In a study aimed at finding associations between interleukin genes and subdomains of negative symptoms in SCZ, calculated based on the Positive and Negative Syndromes Scale, it was found that the association between the IL6 -174G/C (rs1800795) polymorphism and AA scores (avolition and apathy) was close to the level of significance.

Although no significant effect of TRH stimulation on equine ACTH stability was detected in our population (Table 2 ), the P value for an effect of TRH stimulation was close to the level of significance utilized (.05) in the study.

Bonferroni) for group matching since the differences between the matched groups (without correction) were close to the level of significance: this is highly unlikely to be a chance occurrence.

Besides, an increase in COM sway was close to the level of significance ( Table 1 .

Although the difference is small and the p -value is close to the level of significance, we consider this result as being non-trivial for the following reason.

Furthermore, there was a noticeable difference of −6.21° in knee heel strike angle (99.92% CI, -12.68–0.26, p = 0.001) and 5.30° increase in knee ROM (99.92% CI, −1.48–12.03, p = 0.011) in MCI compared with NC, as they were close to the level of significance.

There was no significant difference (p=0.056, Mann-Whitney test) between the age range of CFRD-negative (27.7 ± 9.7 years, mean ± S.D., n=19) and CFRD-positive PwCF (34.2 ± 9.1 years, mean ± S.D., n=15) in our cohort, although the p-value was close to the level of significance.

The adjusted p -value for vegetable intake changed to 0.06, close to the level of significance set at 0.05.

14 , 15 Though these findings are promising, the sample sizes are very small, many of the studies focused on specific products, including synthetic cannabinoids, and confidence intervals span close to the level of significance. 14 Thus, we have very limited evidence regarding the efficacy of products available to patients in states with medical cannabis, including the relative benefits of THC, CBD, or various THC/CBD ratios for pain.

For lead (Pb), the p value of 0.051 is close to the level of significance, which may suggest that the differences in the levels of this element may be significant; however, at the level of 0.05, the result is ambiguous.

In ESRD patients there was also a weak correlation between FXIII values and the patients’ age ( Figure 2 E,F), but very likely due to the relatively low patients’ number the p values were only close to the level of significance.

We acknowledge that, as with many analyses, we might have a few false-positive results and that the results should be interpreted with care, especially when p values are close to the level of significance.