Barely Significant
← all phrases

“close-to-significant”

172 sentences · 172 papers · 2,316 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Listed by Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

The carcinogenic ratio, which combines E3, 4-OHE (1 and 2), 16α-OHE1 and 2-OHE (1 and 2) provided more interesting results, given the significant or close-to-significant results for the treatment groups and lack thereof in the placebo groups.
The close-to-significant interaction in the main model, the post-hoc analyses on QSS slope trend estimates, and the visual inspection of Figure 8 show that realistic landmark visualization is most helpful in landmark sequence memory for participants with low spatial abilities, and this difference between the conditions diminishes with increased spatial abilities. 3.3.3.
Gender Differences in Responses to the Trainer Survey Of the 14 issues tested, 5 had significant or close-to-significant gender differences: In track design and surface, after combining levels 2, 3 and 4, male respondents (M) were more likely than female respondents (F) to say that their horses raced on other types of tracks (gradual turning turf: M = 17, F = 9; gradual or tight turf or synthetic: M = 10, F = 5; other: M = 16, F = 1) (Χ 2 = 6.1, p = 0.048).
In addition, TBARS concentrations showed a close-to-significant relationship with increased endometriosis risk [OR 1.6; 95%CI 1.0–2.8], and classification by TBARS concentration tertile revealed that the association between endometriosis risk and concentrations of BPA [OR 2.0; 95%CI 1.0–4.1] and Σbisphenols [OR 2.2; 95%CI 1.0–4.6] was only statistically significant for women in the highest TBARS tertile (>4.23 μM).
These studies indicated that 24 h following incubation with the glycolysis inhibitor, p65 activation by TNFα + IL-1β was reduced in both TNBC cells ( Figure 9 B); here again, downregulation of p65 by the glycolysis inhibitor (2-DG) in MDA-MB-231 cells was consistent in three different independent experiments ( p = 0.0505; Table S7B ); however, they came out only close-to-significant when considered all together ( Figure 9 B2) because of variability that was noted between the different experiments in the levels of phosphorylation in cells without inhibitors, and in the extent of decrease in p65 induced by 2-DG ( Table S7B ).