“close to significance”

Although, testing periods, the p value was close to significance, significance was only reached for day 12 and 21, with treated animals dipping their head around 28 times compared with only 13 times at 12 days post-stroke and 11.7 at 21 days post-stroke (Figure 4 and Table 3 ).

However, we found a close to significance trend for trials where the first author was a psychologist/social scientist to report more favorable outcomes for pharmacotherapy than studies where the first author was a psychiatrist/MD (b = -0.25, 95% CI -.51 to 0.01, p = 0.06).

4 B) was observed on RA PB neutrophils and an increase close to significance was observed on RA PB monocytes when compared to these cell populations from healthy donors.

with majority illness duration <1 year, with positive family history in 27% (more in females) and 45 % comorbid substance use disorder • PANSS scale total score of 104.38(overall), 103.30 (female) and 105.52 in (Males) • Comparing mean PANSS scores showed statistically insignificant difference in all subdomains but close to significance in the PANSS Positive domain.

However, the p-values were close to significance and with more samples, the resolution of the peaks may improve.

Perhaps a greater sample size could have identified a statistical association, for example, with death due to heart failure which showed results close to significance, in agreement with Proser et al [ 42 ], reporting a strong association of both (OR 4.62).

A “broken stick” test determined that only the first two dimensions were significant in explaining total variance, with dimensions 3 and 4 close to significance at 95%.

If the data is close to significance, then additional data may just be needed to reach statistical significance.

The coefficients are however negative, and for one city it was close to significance with about 1 less burning car than expected on days with a helicopter patrol.

However, the level of education, governate, nationality and the number of medical conditions were not significantly associated with willingness to deprescribe, whereas the number of chronic medical conditions (P = 0.067) and history of being admitted to the hospital (P = 0.067) were close to significance.

For FCDD, variables such as YSM ( P = 0.07) and serum OCN ( P = 0.06) showed trends close to significance.

NCGS showed a Marsh 1 grade in the 68.2%, versus the 41.5% in the other group, with a p = 0.07, close to significance.

Asparagine was associated with poor RFS in females but not males with a P interaction,RFS close to significance ( Appendix B , Table A2 ). 2.3.

Although the effect of the state was close to significance ( β ˆ = 0.12; 95% CI: −0.02, 0.26), the marginal R 2 = .033 indicates an extremely low predictive value of the fixed effects.

Sex was related to the prevalence of Rs for ABS and close to significance for SMM.

However adjusting for previous psychological distress left the odds at a similar high level close to significance, indicating that the health-related selection could not fully explain the higher odds in this cluster.

As the effect sizes for the majority of these genes were small (<1 SD) and close to significance cutoff, it may explain the limitations in replicating these findings in our smaller sample set.

The p -value of 0.0554 is slightly above the conventional threshold of 0.05, indicating that the difference between RF and LWRF is not statistically significant at the 5% level, although it is marginally close to significance.

We only found one CpG site that was consistently close to significance in both the SEL analyses and the F2 intercross WGBS.

Nevertheless, the wave I amplitude reduction in the tinnitus with normal hearing compared to the normal hearing controls was close to significance with a higher limit of the 95% CI of 0.24 μV compared to 0.23 μV 95% CI lower limit for the controls.

The results from qRT-PCR showed trends that coincided with the microarray, although the only statistically significant changes in expression were for the FALZ gene (CIR and ZFP36 showing values close to significance level).

Although no statistically significant difference was observed in serum CRP concentrations between the group diagnosed with DVT or PTE and the group without DVT or PTE, the difference was close to significance.

MB is significant, while all other interaction terms for sex and the aforementioned variables are not (with interaction term for sex and age close to significance, cf. supplemental Table 2 ).

The GO term “osteoclast differentiation” showed differential expression close to significance (GO: 0030316; Figure S5B , Table S5 ).

Being on immunosuppression was close to significance, with a P ‐value of 0.052.