“close to significance”

These between-group differences were close to significance (Experimental group vs Care As Usual: F[1] = 3.993, sig = 0.06; Experimental group vs Control robot group: F[1] = 3.792, sig = 0.066).

Although exercise performance and perceived exertion of that session was significantly higher, the perception of recovery after the RF session was close to significance when compared to the Free session.

Was there a power analysis? For example Fig; 1C seems to be trending or close to significance, yet there are only 3 samples per group and no P-value is provide.

In the case of cN+ status, the p value was close to significance (0.06).

The interaction between Varroa and pollen was close to significance ( Supplementary Figure 3A ); no other significant interactions were noted ( Supplementary Figures 3B,C ).

There was only a reduction close to significance in hs-CRP levels after SD consumption compared to CM [ 37 ].

In Table 12 a–d, it is interesting that only one demographic variable is significant— Ability Profile and that only one is close to significance ( STEM vs.

The interaction term between time and session, although close to significance, suggests a potential, yet non-conclusive, modification in the time effect on SBP by session, with a 0.0 % change per session (95 % CI: −0.0–0.1 %).

When non-easy questions were specifically analyzed, the differences in the discriminative indices of factual questions between group 1 and group 2 were close to significance.

S2 ), and it appeared that NO 2/3 increased predominantly in winter ( p value close to significance at 0.05), when air inversions persisted in the Flathead Valley ( Fig. 4 ).

In particular, we focused on signals that were close to significance, as concordance between multiple noncoding or intergenic regions and their previous, independent annotations could both serve as a validation and potentially point to polygenic effects.

With a p -value of 0.048 in the univariable analysis, however, this association was only close to significance.

For this analysis we have selected markers that in the overall population were significantly associated with TL change or were close to significance.

On the other hand, although there is no statically significant relationship between SSS and SDS scores and N/L ratio, some values have been obtained that are close to significance levels.

Although in our study, prior prolapse repair surgery, as a whole, appeared close to significance at univariate analysis; neither this factor nor a prior posterior wall repair could be identified as significant risk factor for anatomic failure of the posterior compartment.

tianjinensis n = 231, ß = 0.090 ± 0.0609, t 229 = 1.479, P = 0.0703, Adjusted R 2 = 0.0051) covariance was close to significance, but for all cestodes and larval cestodes covariances were not significant.

The major stem cell marker Lgr5 was not affected significantly by CP exposure, although it was close to significance, and the effect was confirmed in a subsequent experiment (see Fig. 10B ).

The two negative control sets performed as expected: housekeeping genes returned a p-value of 0.098, and monoaminergic pathways came in at 0.71, with neither anywhere close to significance.

gnrh1 (but not kiss1 ) levels also reach close to significance in LPtoSP females ( p gnrh1 = 0.051; p kiss1 = 0.634) (Fig. 1f, g ).

Cacna1g and Cacna1h were significantly increased, and Cacna1i displayed a trend toward an increase, with a p -value close to significance ( Fig. 1A ).

The difference was statistically significant at 1 year ( P ≤ 0.01) for Okuda, CLIP, BCLC and MELD, and close to significance for Child–Pugh.

Comparing the phase-locked conditions, we found that the reduction in tremor amplitude was close to significance (not corrected) only at a phase-lag of 0° (Fig. 4a ) but the number of participants who showed a significant reduction in tremor amplitude was not significant (Fig. 4b ).

Comorbid PTSD and MDD was not associated with PSS in one study [ 46 ], however the p-value was close to significance at 0.06.

Rates of QOL were significantly lower in intersex compared to non-intersex groups, with rates of distress close to significance.

Whereas the age and HRV-mediated pathway predicting PTSD symptoms was close to significance (indirect bootstrapped B = .006, SE = .005, 95 % CI = [−.0001–.0196]), the pathways for distress (indirect bootstrapped B = .06, SE = .07, 95 % CI = [−.02–.26]) and aggressive behavior (indirect bootstrapped B = .02, SE = .03, 95 % CI = [−.02–.10]) showed no such trend.