“close to significance”

Follow-up one-way ANOVAs showed that the main effect of distance was close to significance in both patients ( F (2,4) = 7.649, p = 0.086) and controls ( F (2,4) = 10.169, p = 0.054).

In particular, Chame was the locality with the lowest Fs value and a p ‐value close to significance (Fs = −4.30, p = 0.086), which supports the signal detected by the Tajima's D index, see Table 1 .

In addition, the main effect of Source was significant (beta = .016, P = .002) and the intercept was close to significance (beta = .0053, P = .086).

In contrast, Group 2 displayed an increasing trend close to significance in high-frequency SE at the left Guan pulse after acupuncture treatment ( p =0.0864).

Mortality was significantly lower in group 3 when compared to group 1 (64.7% vs 18.2%, p = 0.016) and close to significance when compared to group 2 (50% vs 18.2% p = 0.087).

Urban residence came close to significance (p = 0.087), hinting at a potential trend of higher odds of the outcome among city residents.

The main effect of the group was close to significance [ F (1, 400) = 2.941, p = 0.087].

Although the loss of stimulation response was not statistically significant in patients with an operation time of ≥ 115 min, it was detected at a rate close to significance ( p = 0.087) (Table 5 ).

It is noteworthy in this regard that no trend was observed using parametric procedures and that only the BMI obtained a value close to significance ( p = 0.088), followed by autonomy support ( p = 0.103), both being slightly higher values in girls. 4.

With regards to sexist comments, model comparison indicated that the three-way interaction effect of relationship type x PC x perceived sexism was close to significance (F(3, 153) = 2.23, p = 0.088), where the regression coefficients for the three-way interaction PC * SSE * Source (Partner) ( t = − 2.11, p = 0.04) and PC * SSE * Source (Supervisor) ( t = − 2.13, p = 0.04) were significant (Table 5 ).

In females, the levels of Snap25 and Bdnf were close to significance between HFD-FO and HFD in the motor and auditory cortices ( p = 0.088 and p = 0.072, respectively) ( Figure 5 B).

Age and smoking came close to significance (p = 0.0885 and 0.0901, respectively).

Similarly, SSIs at 90 days (0.5% versus 0.2%) and one year (0.6% versus 0.2%) were greater in the cefazolin-only cohort, and the difference was getting close to significance ( P > 0.089) (See Table 2 ).

For beta, no significant effect was obtained although the effect was close to significance ( F = 3.06, p = 0.089), showing a similar pattern as for the gamma frequency band.

The variable ultra-PTFE has a coefficient of −14.438 and is close to significance ( p = 0.0896).

The focus of the intervention was close to significance (Q = 2,88; p = 0,09).

Then to determine most potential predictors we used multiple linear regression models including all factors with stepwise procedure retaining only those which were significant ( p < 0.05) or close to significance ( p < 0.09).

After adjusting for BMI and age, the significant intergroup difference in Ct.Po was lost, but P-values were still close to significance ( p = 0.090).

The difference in AHI of 5.8 ± 3.2 points between the two groups was close to significance ( p = 0.09).

A correlation close to significance was found between SCORAD and erythema on uninvolved skin (r = 0.250, p = 0.090).

The calculated SF opt did not change with speed, but the interaction effect of speed and SF was close to significance (p = 0.09).

The between group difference in the percentage of participants who improved were close to significance ( P = 0.09 using Fisher's exact test).

Additionally, moderate-intensity activities had a negative association with loneliness scores, but the difference was close to significance ( p = 0.09).

Results In the NIALOAD study, one SNP was significantly associated with AD and three additional markers were close to significance (rs6499640, rs10852521, rs16945088, rs8044769, FDR p-value: 0.05<p<0.09).

8B ), which was close to significance (p = 0.09).