To explain which of the risk factors had an impact on pneumonia severity, a multiple regression model was set with 10 variables in Block 1, of which seven predictors were obtained ( p < 0.001), of which three occured significant: IL-6, CRP, obesity ( p < 0.05) and two variables were close to significance: D-dimer and lymphocyte levels ( p = 0.074, p = 0.073).
2 ), while the percentage increase in FEV1 was close to significance ( P = 0.074, data not shown).
Specifically, the difference was statistically significant at cisplatin 25 μM, and close to significance at cisplatin 10 μM (p = 0.075).
Other age groups show positive estimates, with the age group 25–34 being close to significance (p = 0.075).
Scores for two other dimensions (Dimensions 1 and 4; Overall perceptions of resident safety—organizational learning and Supervisor expectations and actions promoting resident safety ) also increased, and were close to significance ( p = 0.075 and 0.067) ( Fig 2 ).
Furthermore, there was no difference between NORMO and HYPO tests in SVR response (panel h), although it was close to significance ( p = 0.075).
The increased risk associated with lower Hb levels dropped to a 1.4-fold rise in progression risk, nevertheless showing a P value close to significance ( P = 0.075).
Direct comparisons of the hydration improvement between participants in the control and OS‐01 groups reveal a significant enhancement in the hydration of the upper arm ( p = 0.022) and close to significance in the forearm ( p = 0.075) on the subjects using the OS‐01 formulation.
The ERS analysis between amygdala and hippocampus was close to significance (summed t-value = 18.38, P = 0.075, n = 12; Supplementary Fig. 13b ), potentially suggesting that the information carried by more than one peak may be needed for the reactivation process.
Figure 1 C), and similarly found a significant effect to the condition (χ 2 = 29.11; df = 2,146; p = 4.777*10 −7 ) and an SLC rate in the 5 mM PTZ group (0.2 ± 0.03) lower than the baseline (0.48 ± 0.04) in a statistically significant manner (z = 5.382, p = 2.210*10 −7 ) although the difference from the SLC rates in behavior-tracked controls (0.31 ± 0.04) was only close to significance (z = 2.229, p = 7.532*10 −2 ).
5.59 (ng/mL), p = 0.007), while the differences between NET patients and controls were close to significance (5.59 vs. 3.67 (ng/mL), p = 0.076).
Interestingly, although HbA 1c level was found to be significantly positively correlated to the severity of coronary artery stenosis in DM patients (95% CI 0.040 to 0.312, P = 0.011), the P value was yet close to significance in non-DM patients (95% CI −0.648 to 0.032, P = 0.076) (Table 3 a, b).
Although one-way ANOVA yielded a p -value close to significance ( p = 0.076), Bonferroni post hoc analysis did not confirm statistically significant differences between the groups.
The difference between the two lengths was close to significance in the leftward ingoing/rightward outgoing Stimulus ( p = 0.076).
The increase of the mean Y-BOCS score from post-treatment to follow-up was small, but close to significance, t (119) = -1.79; p = .076, d = -0.12 (see Figure 1a ).
The C2 vs C5 comparison was found close to significance by t test ( p = 0.076).
The initially applied KW test (for VP1, VP2, and CP; df=2) demonstrated the only significant difference for the jerk score ( p = 0.001 with H = 10.227), even though for entropy it was close to significance ( p = 0.076, H = 3.157); immobility exhibited no difference ( p = 0.776, H = 0.081).
Separate linear mixed model analyses for each cluster showed that there was a significant effect of cue size for cluster 1 [ F (2, 18) = 5.986, p = 0.010] but only close to significance for cluster 2 [ F (2, 18) = 2.980, p = 0.076].
Table 2 shows that after multivariate linear regression the association of the VEGF rs699947 polymorphism with the number of suicide attempts in the recessive model was close to significance ( Table 2 ; p -value = 0.076).
As illustrated in Figure 1 C, a reduced (close to significance) AUC was found for the September intervention group (135.5 ± 47.5 mmol/L*min for control, 89.7 ± 65.5 mmol/L*min for the September intervention group, p = 0.076). 3.2.
In the other levels differences in variability between species were not significant (USO4 upper: F = 0.71, P = 0.507; U04 lower: F = 2.35, P = 0.113; USO6: F = 1.97, P = 0.182), or close to significance (USO2: F = 2.99, P = 0.077), and post-hoc Tukey’s HSD only revealed significant differences in variability in δ 34 S between Rangifer and Equus in Level USO2.
LTPA was close to significance ( P = 0.077), while group was no longer significant ( P = 0.220).
In our small cohort, Aβ 42/40 reached statistical significance when comparing both groups and p -value was close to significance level for Aβ 42 /p-Tau ( p = 0.077; Table 1 ).
We also observed that the presence of any type of seizures after stroke (early or late) may depend on stroke subtype (the difference was close to significance, p = 0.077).
The GLM analysis of F3 scores ( Table 2 ) shows that temperature had a significant effect on the size of skin epithelial cells and chondrocytes, but because the interaction between sex and the thermal environment was close to significance ( P =0.077), we interpreted the effects of temperature in association with the sex of the geckos.