“close to significance”

In the third level, the association between self-medication and being a non-healthcare student was close to significance ( p = 0.07) and the variable was kept in the model.

However, the B cells percentage in the spinal cord was elevated (the difference was close to significance, p = 0.07) in the i-mn- Sod2 KO mice compared to the controls ( Fig. 6 B).

The effect of emotional valence was close to significance level, F (1, 72) = 2.62, p = .07.

Pairwise comparisons showed that the EG showed significant results between the Baseline and the Acquisition-SQIC condition ( p < 0.0001) and close to significance between the Baseline and the Transfer condition ( p = 0.07). 4.4.

This was significant at year 2 (Rho [11] = 0.80, p < 0.01) and year 3 (Rho [10] = 0.73, p < 0.05) and close to significance at year 1 (Rho [12] = 0.53, p = 0.07), suggesting profundity of NDE increases commensurate with years of meditation experience.

The effect of the covariate experimenter was close to significance ( p = 0.07).

The QTL located on Chr 4 (87.7–88.04 Mb) was confirmed having effects close to significance in Bacteroides (LRS = 17.7, 87.7–88.04 Mb, P = 0.07) with trends for Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes (P<0.42).

While transient hypoglycemia (study 2) caused 124% increase (124.0%±42.0%) of APP, less-severe prolonged hypoglycemia (study 1) resulted in ~26% decrease (−26.1%±21.2%) of APP in controls ( figure 4A ); this differential trend between the two studies was close to significance (p=0.07).

The difference was also almost close to significance ( p = 0.07) for luminal B (ER and/or PR+; HER2+) BC.

On the contrary the one-way ANOVA for the more caudal level reported a value of p close to significance (F [4,20] = 2.55, p = 0.07).

Higher similarity to SCZ in the schizo-bipolar scale (SBS) was close to significance (d Cohen =0.23, t = 1.815, p = 0.07) (Fig. 4 and Table S3 ).

Placing an 11.5-mm implant was negatively correlated to bone loss at 2 years (close to significance at p = 0.07), indicating that 11.5-mm length might be a predictor for lesser bone loss.

On the other hand, in the related condition, the group effect was close to significance in the participant analysis, t 1 (58) = 1.84, p = 0.07, and it was significant in the item analysis, t 2 (40) = 2.87, p = 0.007.

The same could be stated for miRNA-181c-5p, which, although not statistically significantly dysregulated in the two animal models of AD, had a p -value close to significance ( p < 0.070) in the rat model as compared with APPswe/PS1dE9 transgenic mice ( p < 0.748). 3.7.

In the IG(+) group, such a correlation was not observed but it was close to significance (Rs = −0.39, p = 0.07).

Differences were close to significance in the unweighted model (p = 0.07) but became significant in the weighted model (p = 0.004), suggesting that AAA1 clustering corresponds more closely to zones with higher intensity of soil pollution, rather than merely to the number of sites. 3.1.4 AAA1 hotspots and years of life lost or gained To explore the link between AAA1 levels and life expectancy, AAA1 hotspots were compared with YPLLG values using a 100-m buffer.

No other ISI from 1 to 15 ms induced a MEP change that reached significance level although 2 and 5 ms were close to significance (p = 0.07 and p = 0.06 respectively).

For ants, the association for Sørensen dissimilarity is close to significance ( P = 0.07), whereas the high relative abundance of Yellow-whiskered greenbul ( Andropadus latirostris ; 34% of all captures in regrowth and 42% in old-growth) makes the association for Morisita-Horn dissimilarity nonsignificant in birds.

Considering the whole population, this trend was close to significance (p = 0.07).

MB210B had a memory index close to significance (p = 0.07).

The SBI rate (events per patient per year) was also much lower among managed patients and close to significance (0.12 vs 0.45, P =0.07; Table 2 ).

While no significant correlation was found between log-transformed data for CAC score and total CaSR expression, these data were close to significance ( P = 0.07).

Nevertheless, interactions were not significant for WC ( p = 0.23) and close to significance for WHR ( p = 0.07).

0.0%), this was only close to significance ( p = 0.07), possibly due to the low number of patients in this age category (12 patients in controls and 420 in constipated patients).

Comparison of implant success was statistically significant on implant level (HD: 53.8%, BL: 68.9%, p = 0.045) and close to significance on group level ( p = 0.07).