However, the proportion of genus Roseburia negatively correlated with plasma glucose at levels close to significance (R = −0.52, P = 0.06; data not shown), whereas the opposite trend was observed for the genus Prevotella (R = 0.32, P = 0.15; data not shown).
Only the adjunctive pessary therapy was associated with the prolongation of pregnancy above 28 weeks with OR 5.9 and with p close to significance ( p = 0.06). 4.
Eleven DMS were confirmed by EpiTYPER; nine displayed directionally consistent results between insulin-resistant and insulin-sensitive women in both microarray and EpiTYPER analysis, of which four remained nominally significant, and three more were close to significance ( p < 0.06) (ESM Table 2 ).
We also reanalyzed our microarray data searching for genes of the Ub/Ub-like pathways close to significance in a context of oxidative stress (0.05 ≤ p < 0.06).
In the blind hemifield, the effect of individual traits compared to baseline was close to significance [ F (4, 21) = 2.3, p = 0.06).
Phase alignment is weaker for the second alap section with 2 participants showing significant alignment and 3 close to significance (Kuiper p = 0.06).
1 ) points in the same direction: cows with <60 days had 1.86 affected quarters/cow and cows with >120 days had 2.59 affected quarters/cow, which is close to significance ( p < 0.06).
In this present study, we compare the LGE (+) and LGE (-) patients, and find that LGE (+) group have lower LVEF, the p value of LVEF is close to significance (P = 0.06).
Furthermore, ERα expression was negatively correlated with tumor grade (P < 0.05) while for PR the negative correlation was only close to significance (P = 0.06).
The interaction between openness with family/friends and HIV partner disclosure was close to significance ( p = 0.06).
The seasonal difference in the Monday peak was found to be close to significance for female residents in the rest of Queensland ( γ 2,spr = 0.54, p = 0.06). 4.
( Shek et al., 2014 ) found the difference between the groups in reduction in weight and percent body fat were close to significance (p = 0.06 and p = 0.05), with heavier participants being more likely to be diagnosed with type two diabetes at 36 months follow-up).
(orchardgrass), associated with the control treatment, was close to significance (P = 0.06).
When first analyzing all patients ( Figure 1 ), a group effect was close to significance (p=0.06) related to the presence or absence of apathy, with a significant interaction effect between group and time (p<0.001).
However, between weeks 2 and 11 differences in protein intake came close to significance ( p = 0.06, ES = 1.18). 3.2.
No effect of hearing status was found on the turn duration at low background noise, although the result was close to significance ( p = 0.06).
pure 50 mGy β-irradiation—24 h) were close to significance (two-sample independent t -test with Welch correction, p = 0.06).
The between-group difference for infections was close to significance ( P = 0.06) [ 104 ].
The difference in displacement of the posterior zone of apposition (R5) of right hemi-diaphragm was close to significance (median 10.3 mm [IQR, 5.5–12.8] vs. 11.9 mm [IQR, 10.4–18.9], p value = 0.06).
tuberculosis -specific CD4 T-cell TNF-α production in vitro [ 33 ], were detected at significantly (or close to significance, p = 0.06 , for IL-5) higher concentrations in aerosol-vaccinated animals two weeks after vaccination. 3.9.
Although this region did not survive the multiple comparisons analysis, it is reported for two reasons: first, due to the hypothesis concerning TPJ involvement in future prediction (see the Introduction ); second, the p value of this region after correction was close to significance ( p = 0.06).
Reaction Time, Movement Duration, and Mean Tangential Velocity (Vmean) Although close to significance, the ANOVA conducted on reaction time (mean = 294 ms ± 40) revealed no main effect of the Environment ( F (1, 6) = 5.96; p = 0.06).
The difference in weber fraction between groups was close to significance for the sparse arrays (t (28) = 1.90 p = 0.06, BF = 1.33) and not significant for the dense arrays (t (28) = 0.17 p = 0.86, BF = 0.34).
In the population of patients with apocrine tumors, the association was close to significance, but the small number of patients made it impossible to draw robust conclusions ( n =21; MFS: p =0.06 and OS: p =0.07) ( Figure S3 ).
Upon subgroup analysis in our study, our model remained significant in patients treated with adjuvant therapy (HR = 0.62 [0.4;0.83]; p = 0.001), and close to significance in untreated patients (HR = 0.70 [0.47;1.04]; p = 0.06); this analysis was conducted on the pooled cohorts to increase statistical power ( Figure 2 ). 3.3.