close to significancep = 0.057
Compared both mean scores, using the beta regression model, a statistical trend close to significance ( p = 0.057) was found, in relation to the IRS of OOC group, which were lower those in the KCOT group.
Compared both mean scores, using the beta regression model, a statistical trend close to significance ( p = 0.057) was found, in relation to the IRS of OOC group, which were lower those in the KCOT group.
MPI reduction following ETHR knockdown via the MB γ lobe-specific driver MB131B / UAS-ETHR RNAi-Sym was significant ( p < 0.01), whereas the MB009B / UAS-ETHR RNAi-Sym trended close to significance at the 95% level ( p = 0.057).
Time spent in REM sleep was close to significance (F (3,44) = 2.7, p = 0.057), where less time in REM sleep on D1-D3 showed medium-to-large effect sizes (D1: −30.9 ± 11.3 min, d = 0.97; D2: −22.8 ± 11.3 min, d = 0.71; D3: −15.1± 11.3 min, d = 0.47).
In the experimentally assessed prosociality model the main effect of the BDNF polymorphism was significant ( b = −.26, SE = .12, p < .05) and the interaction was close to significance ( b = −.13, SE = .07, p = .057).
Among the 10 patients that were assessed for 6MMP:6TG ratio, all had lower average 6MMP:6TGN ratios after allopurinol compared to before allopurinol; the percentage of weeks that goal 6MMP:6TGN ratio (<40) were maintained were statistically significant in 6 patients ( p <0.05) and close to significance in 2 other patients ( p =0.057).
Improvement in performance for voiced plosives differing by place of articulation was also close to significance (mean change in performance of 8.3%; SD: 11.4%; t (19) = 3.3, p = 0.057).
Similarly, AS women had higher SI values compared to men, but still, the difference was close to significance ( p = 0.057) ( Figure 3 A).
At the same time, MYO was significantly more present in individuals with the presence of at least one R allele in the recessive model ( p = 0.019/ES = 0.409) but only close to significance in the genotype model ( p = 0.057/ES = 0.129).
1 G), with statistics close to significance ( p = 0.057).
The only exception was the HRR color test, though it was close to significance ( p = 0.057).
Although there was no statistically significant difference between the suPAR levels in terms of the response to treatment (among 54 patients receiving immunosuppressive treatment), it was found close to significance since p = 0.057 (p > 0.05).
In addition, it’s may note that the expression of GPR158 in non-metastatic-OS was seemed higher than the metastatic-OS (P = 0.057, close to significance).
In the RT analysis Test and Emotion interaction was statistically significant [ F (1,17) = 4.39, p = 0.05] as well as interaction of Age, Test, and Emotion close to significance [ F (1,17) = 4.16, p = 0.057].
The total indirect effect via child initiations of treatment transmitted to trial follow‐up CSS was close to significance ( p = .057) and the total overall effect was significant (Wald p = .041, bootstrap CI −0.85 to 0.01).
Receptive vocabulary was close to significance level ( t = 1.92, p = .057) and the contribution of phonological short-term memory was nonsignificant and therefore excluded from the model.
For theta (4–7 Hz) and alpha (7–13 Hz) the results were close to significance (M PD = 1.15, M dyst = 2.45, SD = 0.88, t = −2.01, p = 0.057 and M PD = 1.12, M dyst = 2.07, SD = 0.64, t = −2.01, p = 0.058 respectively) but without correction for multiple testing across bands.
The difference between G1 and F9-C2 treated animals was close to significance (Mann Whitney, P = 0.057, Fig 5F ).
Within the stage 1 group, there was a significant change in breast symmetry scores ( p = 0.02) and nipple to IMF distance changes came close to significance ( p = 0.057).
In L condition both cost indexes (JI and TC) do not differ between arms and movement directions; on the contrary, significant differences can be observed for both JI and TC during high speed trials: anova tests showed a significant effect of “used arm” on TC in H condition (p = 0.0293), and a non-significant effect, but close to significance, on JI (p = 0.0572); moreover, both indexes showed a statistically significant effect of “movement direction” (p < 0.05 for JI and p < 0.01 for TC), while the effect of the interaction “used arm” x “movement direction” is not statistically significant.
MD measurements for reader two were close to significance ( p = 0.0573).
Despite being close to significance ( P = 0.0574), a similar trend in intraplaque content of the neutrophilic product MMP-9 was also observed ( Table 5 ).
The decrease in BAL eosinophilia was found to be close to significance ( p = 0.0578).
Although we observed a marginally significant tendency for breakpoints to cluster at sites where TOX had a strongly predicted secondary structure but TYX did not ( p = 0.0579; Table S2 ), it is important to stress that we performed three separate tests and that we would have expected an approximately one in six chance of finding at least one p -value this close to significance even in the absence of any real associations.
Mean estimates from the mixed model revealed significant preferential attention to upright biological motion at 3 months (M = 56.4%, 95% CI [52.3–60.5%], p < 0.01), at 5 months (M = 55.4%, 95% CI [51.6–59.1%], p < 0.01), at 9 months (M = 56.6%, 95% CI [52.0–61.1%], p < 0.01), at 15 months (M = 61.8%, 95% CI [58.2–65.4%], p < 0.001), and at 24 months (M = 64.1%, 95% CI [60.5–67.6%], p < 0.001), with preference close to significance at 4 months (M = 53.8%, 95% CI [50.0–57.7%], p = 0.058) (all p -values adjusted for multiple comparisons (7 total) using the Benjamini-Hochberg method 54 , with a false discovery rate of 5%).
The regression model for OXY showed that LDH was close to significance ( p = 0.058), suggesting a possible association between tissue turnover and antioxidant capacity.