“close to significance”

There was no difference between the groups PRE and POST in age, height, and weight; nevertheless, BMI was higher in POST than in PRE, with the difference in BMI z-score close to significance ( p = 0.056).

A significant interaction ( P < 0.05) between the ratio and ALA was observed in PALM, PALMO, ALA, and EPA, with total omega-3 PUFAs close to significance at P = 0.056.

The CD34 + /CD133 + progenitor cell number was also lower in smoking women, close to significance (p = 0.056).

Elderly patients (aged ≥60 years) expressed significantly higher ADM transcript in the GSE14468 cohort ( p = 0.034) and this comparison was close to significance in the TCGA-LAML dataset ( p = 0.056).

Interestingly, rs1659400 was not associated with SA (p = 0.823, Chi-square), however when all variables (including gender and age) are entered into a logistic regression analysis, the G×E interaction term is close to significance (P = 0.056, Table 5 ).

The score of aggressiveness towards others also evolved inversely to the prolactin level with a p close to significance (p =0.056).

The observed difference was close to significance (F = 2.043, p = 0.056).

The normal mammary gland showed values close to significance (Spearman: P = 0.056).

Similarly, higher anti‐S1 IgG levels were observed in NPT long shedders (2.65 ± 0.05) as compared to non‐long shedders (2.53 ± 0.04), with a statistical difference close to significance ( p = 0.056). 3.6.

Results Feed conversion (feed/gain) showed means among treatment means close to significance ( P = 0.056) and Tukey’s test for pairwise mean comparisons showed that Pigs in the CFGLN-GLN group had the best feed conversion (feed/gain) in the first three-week period post-weaning, exceeding ( P = 0.044) controls (CFCD-CD) by 34%.

Nevertheless, it is important to emphasize that the interaction between trial type and automation was close to significance ( p = .056), so it is possible that our sample was not large enough to reach significance.

Endocrine Therapy and TSR High TSR predicted poor outcome in luminal cancers treated with endocrine therapy in OS ( p = 0.030) and was close to significance for BCSS ( p = 0.056).

Based on Chi-square test, the association was close to significance for tiamulin (Chi 2 = 3.64; p = 0.056) and statistically significant for valnemulin (Chi 2 = 4.25; p = 0.039).

Differences were statistically significant between G1 and G3 (p=0.030), close to significance between G2 and G3 (p=0.056), and non-significant between G1 and G2 (p=0.530).

230 ± 104 s PR, p = 0.588), although the PR exhibited a greater time spent at peak V̇O 2 close to significance (117 ± 114 vs. 158 ± 109 s, p = 0.056).

More informative was the interaction between instructions, compatibility and bin which went close to significance, F (4, 152) = 2.360, p = 0.056, η 2 p = 0.06, and suggested that the above described increasing effect function was mainly due to the goal-directed instruction group.

The proportion of AE was higher among those who were HIV-positive at randomization, and the difference is close to significance ( p = 0.056, Fisher's exact test).

Expression of Mafa showed a more pronounced decrease close to significance (p = 0.056) than Ins-2 and Pdx-1 in the BKO islets ( Figure 5 E).

Regarding age, Pearson’s correlation showed that triglyceridemia ( p = 0.006) and haemoglobin glycosylation (close to significance, p = 0.056) decreased with age.

Statistically, only the comparison at R2 CpG2 was close to significance ( P = 0.056).

Regarding threat appraisal, a low level of threat perceived by the athlete due to deterrence effect or risk to health, does not predict more positive doping attitudes, despite this factor is being close to significance ( p = 0.056).

We observed an enrichment of QTL in the BSW-like haplotypes in mRDC that was close to significance ( P = 0.056).

Similarly, we found that noise direction was significant, F (2,85) = 42.5, p < .0001, while AGC configuration was only close to significance ( p = .056).

The effect of polyphenol supplementation was close to significance ( p = 0.056), which implies that polyphenol supplementation, as exercise, may induce a decrease in fat mass associated with an increase in muscle mass. 3.4.

A t test revealed that the cats seen per day did not statistically differ between the two studies, although it came close to significance ( t 3.3 = 2.89, p = 0.056).