Barely Significant
← all phrases

“close to significance”

2,131 sentences · 2,131 papers · 2,937 search hits before verification

In the literature

close to significanceP = .05251.0× alpha
In each cell type, both conditions (UV‐only and complete solar light) caused significant increases in all three biomarkers compared to unirradiated controls ( P ≤ .0009, except for the single example of fibroblasts in Figure 2 A in the UV‐only condition where the increase was close to significance, namely P = .0525). 3.2.
close to significancep = 0.0531.1× alpha
The effect of g on the total LCD was not significant, although close to significance threshold (F(2.001, 30.009) = 2.174, p = 0.053, η 2 = 0.038) and associated with a significant g *group effect (F(4.001,30.009) = 4.922, p = 0.004, η 2 = 0.173) and no significant group effect (F2,15) = 2.542, p = 0.112, η 2 = 0.133).
close to significanceP = 0.0531.1× alpha
Replacing ammonium nitrate with a labelled counterpart ( 15 NH 4 15 NO 3 ) did not significantly affect cell viability (two‐sided, two‐sample Welch test, α = 0.05, N = 12, P = 0.222), but was close to significance when combined with 50% v/v deuterium oxide (two‐sided, two‐sample Welch test, α = 0.05, N = 12, P = 0.053; Figure 1c and Table 1 ).
close to significancep = .0531.1× alpha
The correlation was not significant between STAI-SA and RSA in the whole sample, r (51) = −0.15, p = .30, CI 95% [-0.41, 0.13], nor the NoMI group, r (27) = 0.06, p = .76, CI 95% [-0.33, 0.43], but close to significance for the MI group, r (23) = −0.39, p = .053, CI 95% [-0.69, 0.02] (see Fig. 8 ).
close to significancep = 0.0531.1× alpha
The stress by model interaction was close to significance ( p = 0.053), likely due to a slightly higher agreement for the single- than multiple-pronunciation model for SW words only (SW mean difference = 4.588, p = 0.005, 89.98% and 85.39%, respectively; WS mean difference = 1.041, p = 0.688, 71.26% and 72.30%, respectively).
close to significancep = 0.0531.1× alpha
Finally, it was determined whether there was a relationship between the variables type of delivery and type of perineal tear in relation to the total score of CEQ-E 2.0, finding a statistically significant association for the type of delivery ( p = < 0.001), but not for the type of perineal tear, albeit with a value close to significance ( p = 0.053).
close to significancep = 0.0531.1× alpha
Among employed participants, the OR for referral of women, compared to men, was close to significance (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.33-1.01; p = 0.053) after adjustment for exercise test result, exertional chest pain, and age (employed participants are patients with SEI classification 11–57 for manual workers and non-manual employees, Additional file 1 ).
close to significanceP = 0.0531.1× alpha
For new-onset carotid plaque, the AI+OFS regimen showed a higher, though not statistically significant, hazard compared with TAM (HR 3.087; 95% CI, 0.960–9.930; P = 0.059), and baseline HbA1c was similarly close to significance (HR 2.579; 95% CI, 0.987–6.741; P = 0.053).