“close to being statistically significant”

In addition, the CSM differences between RT and RP were close to being statistically significant in the GS ≤7 and PSA ≤20 ng/ml subgroups (HR = 0.30, 95%CI = 0.08–1.05, p = 0.058; HR = 0.41, 95%CI = 0.16–1.01, p = 0.053, respectively).

Unlike the results from the contralateral region, the peak ERD amplitude from the ipsilateral region was close to being statistically significant differences between all of the paradigms ( p = 0.058).

The result was close to being statistically significant ( p = 0.0580).

The only comparison that was close to being statistically significant ( p = 0.0588) was for GA untreated, non-mycorrhizal plants with or without aphids (−GA −/+PA − AMF) versus GA-treated, non-mycorrhizal plants with or without aphids (+GA −/+ PA − AMF) ( Figure S2 ).

Although the effect values for SO 2 and PM 10 decreased slightly to become non-significant after adjusting NO 2 in all subjects, they were still close to being statistically significant, with p=0.059 for SO 2 and p=0.072 for PM 10 .

After 8 weeks, the corresponding average values were 25.00%, 29.70%, and 44.44%, and the difference was close to being statistically significant ( p = 0.06).

However, the mean CAL and BOP changes were very close to being statistically significant ( P = 0.06 and 0.07, respectively).

harzianum T22, although the probability value was close to being statistically significant (χ 2 = 3.48, df = 1, p = 0.06), nor by the interaction Treatment × Date (χ 2 = 6.69, df = 5, p = 0.25).

The difference between the two groups was very close to being statistically significant (p = 0.06).

Here, we observed that oligomeric sE2 induced significantly higher TN neutralizing titers ( p = 0.04), as well as increased neutralization of J6, which was close to being statistically significant ( p = 0.06) (Fig. 3 A, B).

The ACD was detected to be a predictor close to being statistically significant (B = 0.663, p = 0.060).

Twenty-one donors with resolving hepatitis did not differ significantly from 19 donors with chronic infection with respect to age, but the proportion of females in the former group was higher and close to being statistically significant (37% vs 10%; p = 0.06).

Multivariate analysis showed that none of them was independent factor of BAC on mammograms, only the 10-year fatal CVD risk was close to being statistically significant (OR:1.17, CI:0.98-1.38, p=0.06).

The correlation between IL-6 and SAA was significant ( p < 0.01), while the correlation between IL-6 and CRP was close to being statistically significant ( p = 0.06). 4.

The exception was the age difference between the two groups, which was close to being statistically significant (p = 0.06).

Multivariate analysis determined good performance status to be predictive of improved OS, and this was close to being statistically significant ( p = 0.06).

Some photoreceptor‐specific splicing events, such as E20/E16 for cac , were close to being statistically significant ( p = 0.06) and had relatively high Cq values (28–29 cycles) indicative of low expression, supporting the idea that the cellular heterogeneity in the eye masks detection of some photoreceptor‐specific splicing events.

In the present study, the rate of pre‐eclampsia was higher in women with GDM twins than in women with non‐GDM twins; the difference was close to being statistically significant in the univariable analysis ( P = 0.061).

The MANOVA performed on relative changes in [HHb] showed that the main effect of cognitive load was only close to being statistically significant, F (2, 52) = 2.94, p = 0.061, Wilks′ lambda = 0.89.

The comparison of the AI-based mobile colposcope assessment with the gold standard, a biopsy result, showed the results came close to being statistically significant if we considered the abnormality cut-off point at the level of CIN2+ ( p = 0.062); The agreement of AI-colposcopy and histopathological results was only 54.2% (normal vs. abnormal defined as a CIN2+).

Additionally, the decrease in WBGT over the course of the PM practice sessions depicted in figure 1 was statistically significant ( p =0.0001) and the increase as depicted for the AM group was close to being statistically significant ( p =0.0621).

Only the difference in selective attention omission errors was close to being statistically significant ( t = 1.910, p = 0.063).

In logistic regression analysis, years in the profession were close to being statistically significant, where more than ten years in the profession indicated an increased probability of disagreeing with the statement (cOR 1.42; CI 0.98–2.07; n = 690; p = 0.064).

Age at weaning was close to being statistically significant ( p = 0.066), with a higher weaning success rate in children under 5 years.

In addition, there was no statistically significant relationship between age groups and Ki-67 ( Figure 4 ) or p16 median ( Figure 5 ), but the relationship between age group and testin was close to being statistically significant (Chi-square test; p = 0.0667; Table 5 ). 4.