Therefore, in instances where explicitly predicted results were non-significant when reported using two-tailed tests, but significant (or very close to being significant) when used one-tailed tests, we report the results from both.
← all phrases
“close to being significant”
Sighted at
p=0.06
In the literature
The differences in IκBα and phosphorylated Akt were close to being significant.
The first was not significant, once adjusted, whereas the second, coping strategy, was close to being significant, at the 90% level.
A hygienic toilet facility could be necessary for a child as it is close to being significant for both stunting and wasting.
It was correlated positively with the speech rate ( r = 0.265, p = 0.039) and the number of connectives per clause ( r = 0.354, p = 0.005); its correlation with the number of word tokens ( r = 0.225, p = 0.082) was close to being significant and with RTTR nonsignificant.
The maximum predictive areas for the 1 st week [area under curve (AUC) = 0.604 0.057] and the 1 st month (AUC = 0.611 0.059) mortality were close to being significant only for RBC count.
Second, all cross‐lagged effects are small and none are close to being significant (with the possible exception of the path from T3 executive function → t4 language).
The correlation between FEV 1 and TL was very close to being significant, although lower FEV 1 values were also related to shorter telomeres.
The ln_county coefficient is 0.0699656, and the P-value is 0.089, indicating that it is close to being significant at the 10% level.
However, the summary RR for cohort studies was close to being significant, and it can be speculated that cruciferous vegetable intake is likely to be associated with decreased risk of pancreatic cancer if more cohort studies were included.
The connection and unique neighbor number distributions were close to being significant in the tumor networks of carcinoma 1, and carcinoma 2.
In the second test, if we apply the t-test, we observe that only the differences in “Perceived choice” are relevant to have a p-value below 0.05 and “Effort/importance” is close to being significant with a 0.06.
While these differences were not statistically significant, the contrast in the cleavage rate between galactose and sucrose was very close to being significant.
A subset of CD patients in the NOR-SWITCH main trial exhibited a difference that favored the originator and was close to being significant.
The main differences were that the effect for the UK (‘quit smoking’) was no longer significant, while the effect for Norway at 2–3 months came close to being significant.
The results showed an association between rs17863783 in UGT1A6 and ACT, while the association with two SNPs in SLC28A3 (rs7853758 and rs885004) and one in SULT2B1 (rs10426377) was close to being significant.
Second, when the treatment effect was significant (or close to being significant), we performed Tukey’s multiple comparison test.
The intensity of the treatment as a moderator variable was close to being significant, as in our previous study [ 21 ], however, the magnitude of the treatment was significant in the previous, but not in the current study.
The results showed significant changes in the parameters of working memory (inverse digits), execution speed, emotional well-being, planning, personal relationships, and depression and were close to being significant in working memory (direct digits), cognitive flexibility, physical health, tension, and anger in the combined groups.
Importantly, the change in the ratios between the neuroprotective metabolites of KYN (xanthurenic acid and picolinic acid) and the neurotoxic metabolites (KYN + 3-hydroxyanthranilic acid), which can penetrate the blood–brain barrier, was close to being significant, confirming the potential neuroprotective effect of the intervention.
Running the same test again for only relator-centric modularization and the Akoka and Comyn-Wattiau modularization (which comes closest to relator-centric modularization in the rankings), we observe that the difference in ranking is statistically significant considering all experts (Chi-square: 6.10; \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$p < 0.05$$\end{document} p < 0.05 ), close to being significant for the OntoUML subgroup (Chi-square: 3.57; \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$p = 0.059$$\e
Initial analysis showed that the association of OSCC with HIV infection was very close to being significant, which suggested that the sample size was too small to show an effect.
However, no significant relationship between the presence of hypertension and these variables was observed regarding the 2017 ACC/AHA guidelines, although age and family history of hypertension were close to being significant.
Despite the lack of statistically significant results from in vitro-cultured adipocytes, we found a dose-dependent effect on IRS1 expression that was close to being significant.
Relations between sensory weights, clinical vestibular measures, and DHI We observed very small trends in the expected directions, but these relations were not at all close to being significant.