“borderline significant”

Findings of increased activity time of the mtDMN + in the post‐CT during the presentation of trauma‐related pictures were corroborated, although they were only borderline significant after correction for multiple comparisons (pre‐CT vs. post‐CT, p = .0525 after correction, p = .008 uncorrected).

The data demonstrates a borderline significant (trend test p = 0.0525) exposure-response relationship between increased number of combined physical work demands and lower work ability.

We detected a borderline significant interaction between KPS score and treatment regimen group (Wald Chi-squared test = 5.8949; p = 0.0525).

Lesion Measurability and CiRT Status Lesion measurability exhibited a borderline significant association with CiRT classification ( p = 0.0525).

When treated and control group means were considered individually and compared across three time points ( t = 0, 6, and 24 h), there was a borderline significant difference between means ( p = 0.0526) in the neutrophil percentage of control horses.

A borderline significant association with male newborn TL was also found with maternal educational attainment ( β = 0.11, P = 5.28E−02).

The correlation became borderline significant, when values in blood obtained from a peripheral vein were tested (P=0.0528) ( Fig. 4A ).

Additionally, in the between group comparison there was a borderline significant difference between the simple story versus the rebuttal story groups for their perceived scientific value of the story (t(66) = 1.972, p = 0.0528) when corrected for the RPBS scores ( Table 14 ). 6.

Telomere differences across education levels were borderline significant ( F = 3.3, P = 0.0529), as was the relationship between marital status and telomere length ( F = 2.0, P = 0.0967).

This strengthened PFOA and PFDA inverse association with confirmed disability worsening, while PFOS became borderline significant (HR = 0.906, 95% CI: 0.820–1.000, P = 0.053), independent of sex.

This difference was borderline significant for ESR ( p = 0.053) and statistically significant for WBC ( p = 0.011) and neutrophils count ( p = 0.008) (Table 1 ).

There was a significant difference between the level of nose-poking in safe and conditioned visits during the conditioning phase (3-way ANOVA on tone frequency x day x mouse, main effect of frequency F(1,178) = 931.82, p<0.01), and discrimination was borderline significant already on day 1 (F(1,16) = 4.35, p = 0.053).

Joint Analysis of Pneumonitis Risk Alleles In combined analysis, the significant SNPs together with an additional borderline significant variant – IL4R: rs1801275 ( P = 0.053) – showed an increase in pneumonitis risk as the number of unfavorable genotypes increased ( Table 3 ).

The decrease at 15 Gy relative to 5 and 10 Gy analysed together was significant (or borderline significant) for both breast cancer cell lines (P = 0.053 and 0.007, respectively).

Gf had significant influence on Color-Shape mixing cost (β = -0.179, p = 0.05) and the Stroop effect (β = -0.179, p < 0.04), but were also borderline significant for the Simon effect (β = -0.179, p = 0.053), Number-letter switch cost (β = -0.157, p = 0.06), and Color-Shape switch cost (-0.146, p = 0.09).

barbatula was smaller after the gypsum treatment (Table 3 ), but the difference was only borderline significant ( t = −4.2; df = 2; p = 0.053).

There is a positive correlation (ρ = 0.31) between Citrate and percentage area of lumen, however after correcting for multiple testing, it is only borderline significant at the 0.05 level ( p = 0.053).

High PD-1 expression was significantly associated with a prolonged OS in gastric cancer ( p = 0.041), whereas a borderline significant association was observed between high PD-1 expression and a shorter OS ( p = 0.053) in esophageal cancer.

There were borderline significant ( p = 0.053–0.078) indications of downward curvature in the dose response, depending on the adjustment methods used.

The association between multiorgan metastases and PFS remained borderline significant (HR: 3.80; 95% CI: 0.98–14.80; p = 0.053) ( Table 4 ).

After consistent trials, the conflict effect was slightly greater in the left brain region than in the right, with a borderline significant difference ( p = 0.053).

Predictors of LVEDV in subjects with a normal LVEF In subjects with a LVEF ≥55% (n = 84), LVEDV was positively correlated with BSA (r = 0.76, p<0.001) and was higher in males (p<0.001), but male sex was only a borderline significant predictor of LVEDV after adjusting for BSA (p = 0.053).

When the model was further adjusted (Model 3), the difference in physical functioning was only borderline significant (mean difference −4.9 [95% CI −9.9 to 0], P = .053).

In contrast, the KSS group demonstrated a non-significant mean eGFR improvement of 2.88 ± 19.20 ml/min/1.73 m2 (P = 0.426) and a borderline significant mean creatinine decrease of 8.69 ± 23.11 μmol/L (P = 0.053).

There was a borderline significant main effect of time, F (1, 59) = 3.89, p = .053, η p 2 = .062, and significant main effect of pairing type, F (2, 118) = 6.19, p = .003, η p 2 = .095.