“borderline significant”

However, the between-group difference in the emotional well-being subscale was borderline significant ( p = 0.052) with a nine-point difference in median score, favouring the intervention group.

In contrast, results from a recent study of children aged 18 to 59 months from Cameroon indicated that anemic children receiving iron‐fortified infant cereal had a very small but borderline significant higher weight gain (~50 g, p = .052) and significantly higher weight‐for‐age z ‐score compared with the control group (−0.59 versus −1.03; p = .016), although no between‐group differences in height, height‐for‐age, and weight‐for‐height z ‐scores were observed (Ekoe et al., 2020 ).

As shown in Figure 1 , compared to wild-type animals, Tg2576 mice fed with standard diet (“vehicle”) displayed a borderline significant impairment of recognition memory ( p = 0.052).

A trend test showed a borderline significant linear trend in mean QoL scores ( p = 0.052).

We further analyzed the heterozygosity and allele positivity of these two SNPs, and found that rs5498 E469K had high heterozygous index, and the difference of heterozygous frequencies between T1D patients with and without DN was borderline significant (P = 0.052).

There was a significant difference (p-value = 0.0006) in coronal balance between APC (12 ± 9 mm) and the growth rod (29 ± 21 mm) approach (at follow-up); there was also a borderline significant difference between the two groups at pre-op (16 ± 17 mm for APC vs 27 ± 20 mm for the growth rod approach, p-value = 0.052).

We found a significant reduction in phosphorylation levels of GSK3α/β (53.4% reduction, P < 0.001), and a borderline significant reduction in CREB (34% reduction, P = 0.052) and mTOR phosphorylation (21.4% reduction, P = 0.062) (Fig. 5 B) after 48 h exposure to 10 μM SB747651A.

Likewise, the difference in potassium intake between intervention and control may also affect the effect of potassium supplements with a borderline significant direct association ( p = 0.052) ( Figure 3 , Supplemental Table S4 ).

The relationship became borderline significant after adjusting for additional covariates in the final model (model 4: β=0.425, 95% CI= -0.004 to 0.854, p=0.052) ( Table 3 ).

This difference was borderline significant (p=0.052).

A borderline significant positive association was observed between P. aeruginosa infection and the need for IV treatment ( p = 0.052). 3.4.

A borderline significant association between high nuclear KLF4 expression and a marked stromal inflammation was demonstrated ( p = 0.052).

However, there was a borderline significant higher incidence of HLA mismatch in the ATG-T group compared to the ATG-F group (39.1% Vs. 21.2%; p=0.052, Chi-Square test).

A borderline significant interaction effect presented for interference parameters of the VLMT ( F (6,182) = 2.219, p = 0.052).

Efficacy information was prominent in cancer news in the order of colorectal, liver, cervical, skin, stomach, prostate, lung, breast, pancreatic, and thyroid cancers, and their mean differences were borderline significant, F ( df = 9) = 1.89, P = 0.052.

There was also a borderline significant correlation between D1 and the dorsal subiculum Fos counts ( r = .66, p = .052), but not for the D2 index ( r = .55, p = .122).

Here, fibulin-2 expression showed a borderline significant association with RFS (p = 0.052; Table 4 ).

In contrast, associations in women with parity ≥ 2 were borderline significant for continuous (OR = 1.007, P = 0.052) and standardized UA (OR = 1.389, P = 0.052), but the T3 group still showed a significant elevation in risk (OR = 3.099, P = 0.011).

Although, in our study, the gene-diet interaction term between the SNP and dietary intervention on T2D incidence was borderline significant (P = 0.052) at P < 0.05, taking into account that we can consider a P < 0.1 for the significance level of the interaction term as suggestive of interaction when some criteria of reliability are accomplished [ 45 ], our study fulfill these criteria to avoid false negative results and we considered this significance level (P < 0.1) to conduct the stratified analyses by MedDiet intervention groups.

The log-rank test for equality of survival functions was significant for involvement of the cervix ( P = .0098) and borderline significant ( P = .0522) comparing adnexa and serosal involvement.

For tubulovillous crypt phenotypes the proportion of cases with UC‐PDG was borderline significant ( p = 0.0522) than in those with UC‐aspa.

In contrast, during March–May 2014 (n = 96), dominating emm types changed, with a borderline significant increase in emm 3 (from 10% in March–May 2009–2013 to 20% in 2014; χ 2 (1df) = 3.766, p = 0.0523), and a significant >5-fold increase in emm 4 (from 3% to 17%; χ 2 (1df) = 9.478, p = 0.0021).

There was a significant difference between guaifenesin 1200 mg BID and placebo-1200 ( P =0.0211) for GATH and a borderline significant difference between these 2 groups for muscle relaxation ( P =0.0523).

For the discrimination of survivors from non-survivors PCT and creatinine clearance were borderline significant ( P = 0.0523 and P = 0.0539).

Moreover, for the SKOV3 cell line, CXB treatment was borderline significant compared to its control ( p -value= 0.0524) ( Figure 9 B).