Barely Significant
← all phrases

“borderline significant”

11,410 sentences · 11,410 papers · 14,072 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

borderline significantP = 0.0180.4× alphagold
After full adjustment, the TyG index lost significance (continuous variable: OR = 1.24, P = 0.149; only Q3 group was borderline significant OR = 2.18, P = 0.018), and the ZJU index showed no statistical significance in all fully adjusted models (continuous variable: P = 0.291; highest group OR = 1.70, P = 0.112).
borderline significantp = 0.0180.4× alphagold
We tested for interaction between SES and ethnicity in relation to pattern scores and found a borderline significant interaction for the full-fat ( p = 0.018) and meat pattern ( p = 0.017), whereas no interaction was present for the snacking ( p = 0.324) and healthy ( p = 0.260) pattern.
borderline significantp = 0.0180.4× alphagold
3.1 AD and cortical thickness We found a borderline significant association between AD and the decreased CT in the posterior cingulate (IVW‐MR: β = −0.065, p = 0.018, p‐corrected = 0.551) and isthmus cingulate regions (IVW‐MR: β = −0.086, p = 0.003, p‐corrected = 0.188) (Figure 2 , Table S3 ). 3.2 AD and CA We found a borderline significant association between AD and the decreased SA in the supramarginal region (IVW‐MR: β = −0.047, p = 0.044, p ‐corrected = 0.714) and the increased SA in the isthmus cingulate regions (IVW‐MR: β = 0.053, p = 0.018, p ‐corrected = 0.714) (Figure 2 , Table S3 ).
borderline significantP = .020.4× alphagold
Univariate analysis of overall survival using the Cox model showed that stage ( P < .001), CA19-9 levels ( P = .004), and CRHR1 status ( P = .038) were significant factors, and the subsequent multivariate analysis revealed that of these, stage and postoperative CA19-9 levels were borderline significant factors ( P = .02 and .001, respectively) without multicollinearity ( Table 3 ).
borderline significantP = 0.020.4× alphagold
For the study population, both young adults (ages 19–54 years; n = 100; TT = 61, G -allele carriers = 39) and older adults (ages 55+ years; n = 124, TT = 69, G -allele carrier = 55), carriage of the G -allele was associated with a borderline significant retention of FOXO3 expression as a function of age (Fig. 3a , younger participants: P = 0.02; Fig. 3b : P = 0.08).
borderline significantp = 0.020.4× alphagold
A univariate analysis revealed that FKBPL was also a significant predictor of relapse free interval (RFI) within the ER positive patient group, but it was only borderline significant within the smaller tamoxifen treated patient group (HR = 1.32 95% CI 1.05–1.65, p = 0.02 and HR = 1.23 95% CI 0.99–1.54, p = 0.06, respectively).