“borderline significant”

Trauma center designation was not made available in the multivariate logistic regression analysis for calculating propensity scores due to >10% missing data, and ISS (polytrauma) was included because it was borderline significant ( P =0.014) Second, the propensity score was used to match operative and nonoperatively managed patients 1:1 based on caliper distance of 0.05.

However, the likelihood difference between the two models is only borderline significant ( P = 0.014).

The interaction effects between CTQ Sexual Abuse and SNP rs211034 on reaction were borderline significant (β = 202.524, p = 0.014), for positive words (β = 221.785, p = 0.008), for negative words, and (β = 215.121, p = 0.012) for suicide words ( Table 4 , Block 1).

We also found borderline significant decrease of TIP47 (after p-value adjustment) between time points 2 and 4 of value −0.37 (95% CI: −0.65;−0.08, p = 0.014, p adj = 0.082) on logarithmic scale corresponding to 31% decrease (95% CI: 7;48%) on original scale.

A borderline significant difference was observed in the use of statins, with a higher prevalence in the non-severe COVID-19 group compared to the control group ( p = 0.014).

There was a significant main effect for living situation, χ 2 (2) = 39.70, P < .001, and a borderline significant effect for substance use severity, χ 2 (2) = 8.47, P = .014.

The difference in SpO 2 values at 0 min was statistically significant ( P = 0.008), and the interaction between time and genotype was borderline significant ( F (3, 132) = 3.6, P = 0.015): the mean SpO 2 value at 90 min in individuals with HL alleles was higher than that in individuals with non-HL allele.

There was a borderline significant decrease in TMB in the recurrent tumours (P = 0.015, McNemar’s test).

SLEDAI scores showed a borderline significant correlation with the number of positive SSc-associated autoantibodies (r=0.11, p=0.015).

Considering the Bonferroni correction at p < 0.01, there was a borderline significant ( p = 0.015) decrease in the mean total of vegetables that children had never tried or were not sure if they tried between preprogram (1.82 ± 1.84) and post-program (0.95 ± 1.33).

In the La Paz cohort, rs508618 and rs1769792 were significantly ( p = 0.008‐0.009) associated with Hb levels in the additive and dominant genetic models, respectively, while rs1769792 was related to Hb levels in the entire cohort in a borderline significant manner ( p = 0.015).

While SNAI1 showed a borderline significant change in expression, SNAI2 showed statistically significant downregulation in all locations, namely the TC, TP and VTT ( p = 0.015, p = 0.008, and p = 0.021, respectively).

The 1.6 mm decrease was borderline significant ( p = 0.0158 ) .

In our UK-based studies (totalling >17,000 individuals, with fasting glucose measures in ~12,300 individuals), we identified a borderline significant association between rs553668 and fasting glucose measures, with each minor allele being associated with a mean increase of 0.030 mmol/l (95% CI 0.006–0.054; p = 0.016).

Of note, we found a borderline significant enrichment of genes with protein kinase C-like domains (RASGRP1, CDC42BPB and PRKCB; EASE score, 0.14; Fisher’s exact test P=0.016).

According to multivariable analysis, left atrial diameter and previous AAD use remained as significant and AF type as borderline significant predictors of treatment success (maintenance of normal sinus rhythm): OR 0.60 (95% CI 0.40–0.91, p = 0.016) for a 1-cm increase in left atrium diameter, OR 0.50 (0.313–0.808, p = 0.005) for previous use of AADs, and OR 1.49 (0.97–2.22, p = 0.051) for paroxysmal AF type.

Gender was borderline significant in univariate analysis ( P = .016) but did not remain significant in multivariable modelling.

Three SNPs (rs739374, rs6518580 and rs5993820) showed borderline significant association (p=0.016–0.025) with TOF in 356 cases.

Although rs6747096 was borderline significant (uncorrected P = .016) in the UK collection, the effect is in the opposite direction (rs6747096 G allele is more frequent in UK cases versus controls, yet less frequent in Spanish cases versus controls). 1 There are a number of possible reasons for these apparent discrepancies.

59.7 (4.8) % in controls); borderline significant in the adjusted analysis (mean difference − 2.858 (− 5.167, − 0.550) %, p = 0.016).

This SNP (ss73689521 or rs55944529) showed a borderline significant association with schizophrenia (nominal p = 0.016, corrected p = 0.077) in the original sample (912 patients and 600 controls).

Biomarker levels across times In the two-way mixed models analysis, significant main effects for time and borderline significant group effects could be observed for the IC6 biomarker (time: P = 0.0161; group: P = 0.0569) and the IC6/C6M ratio (time: P = 0.0282; group: P = 0.0503).

The association was slightly weaker and borderline significant in a sensitivity analysis using SNPs associated with type 2 diabetes in the BMI-adjusted model (OR 1.15 [95% CI 1.03, 1.30]; p = 0.0166) (ESM Fig. 2 ).

After applying the Bonferroni correction (adjusted p < 0.017), the results remained largely consistent; however, a borderline significant difference was observed between the melancholic and atypical subtypes ( p = 0.017).

In the simplified models in the sensitivity analyses, this suggestive trend of superiority of mRNA vaccines against severe COVID-19 became borderline significant after Bonferroni correction ( p = 0.017) ( Table A4 ) .