“borderline significant”

Interestingly patients with AB blood type had a borderline significant better initial admission status expressed in a higher GCS score (p = 0.051 mean GCS 11.5) compared to non-AB patients.

Borderline significant correlations were observed between LVEF and CK-AUC ( r = -0.28, P = 0.051).

Statistical analyses have shown a borderline significant association between EBV DNA detection and age ( P = 0.051).

Mindfulness shows a borderline significant moderation effect on maladaptive coping and emotional exhaustion (Beta = – 0.260, p = 0.051).

However, after multiple comparisons adjustment, the association of GGAGCGC became insignificant; whereas the apparent association between haplotype AAAAAGC and sE-selectin levels became borderline significant (FDR P = 0.0511).

Hispanic men had a significantly lower risk of death than non-Hispanic white men; this difference remained borderline significant after adjusting for other factors (p = 0.0511).

The latter (norepinephrine) showed a borderline significant interaction effect with the intervention (F(5, 90)= 2.303; p = 0.0511).

The association of body weight with CPI concentration in the linear regression analysis was borderline significant (1% increase per 10% increase in body weight, P = 0.0511).

Moreover, a borderline significant negative correlation was found with nuclear grade ( P =0.0511 for MMP-2 and 0.0794 for MMP-9).

indicated that taxane chemotherapy was associated with a borderline significant increase in risk of mild swelling compared to no chemotherapy (HR 1.31, p = 0.0512), and a significant increase in risk of mild swelling compared to non-taxane chemotherapy (HR 1.86, p = 0.0398).

Instead, the increased expression of miR-146a-5p in ulcerated melanomas was borderline significant ( p = 0.0513) ( Figure 4 ).

Parent role modelling: parents reported significant increases in the days that their child saw them drink low-fat milk (0.87 days, P = 0.0324) and there was a borderline significant decrease in the number of days that their child saw them eating fast food (−0.33 days, P = 0.0513).

Finally, a Cox proportional hazards model that included the demographic factors in Table 1 and lung cancer stage showed that abnormal galectin-1 levels were not significantly correlated with OS, with a hazard ratio of 2.928 (95% CI of 0.9940 to 8.625), yet it was borderline significant with p = 0.0513.

There was a borderline significant sex by resource guarding status interaction for likelihood of return ( X 2 = 3.80, d.f. = 1, p = 0.0514).

Diabetes measures An adjusted regression model did not find a significant association between EHR use and eye screening among diabetes patients, though the results were borderline significant (p = 0.0514) in the unadjusted model.

(2007b) yielded a borderline significant effect favoring DFP (SMD: −0.21; 95% CI: −0.42 to 0.00; P = 0.0515), suggesting that this particular study may have influenced the overall result.

A model including a term for interaction between time and self-rated health was tested, and the test was significant for women ( P = 0.0056), while it was borderline significant for men ( P = 0.0516).

Figure 6 shows that cDCs stimulated T lymphocyte proliferation better than PBMCs ( p = 0.0174), and also better, although borderline significant, than monocytes ( p = 0.0517) ( Figure 6 ).

Chi squared is borderline significant for small type 1 clusters (32% divergent clusters) versus all genes (29% divergent clusters; chi squared 7.7374, df = 3, P = 0.0518) but not sliding window SR clusters (28% divergent clusters) versus all genes (chi squared 5.6318, df = 3, P = 0.1310).

CPZ had a strong effect on the density of OLs that had proliferated during the stimulation period (EdU + OLIG2 + ) (F(1,28) = 34.79, p < 0.0001; see Figure 2 E), and tACS tended to increase the number of these OLs, with a borderline significant stimulation effect (F(1,28) = 4.124, p = 0.0519) and interaction effect between diet and stimulation (F(1,28) = 3.785, p = 0.0618).

Furthermore, BAT volume was lower in South Asians as compared to white Caucasians (185 mL vs 303 mL), which was borderline significant (p = 0.052) while the difference was significant in the original study 25 due to larger sample size.

(2023), who found no significant association among schoolteachers in a multivariable logistic regression model [ 109 ], all studies showed that low income increased the risk of low oral health literacy, regardless of scale, income definition, statistical method, or population (significant: n = 5 (71.4%), non-significant: n = 1 (14.3%), borderline significant ( p = 0.052) [ 110 ]: n = 1 (14.3%)).

We found that FIS-1 was borderline significant for a time effect (p = 0.052), while PINK-1 and BNIP-3 showed significant 24-h variation ( PINK-1 p = 0.031; BNIP-3 p = 0.004).

The difference was borderline significant at baseline (independent sample t -test, P = 0.052) and significant at follow-up ( P = 0.028).

Secondary Outcomes Absolute RPF decreased significantly, by 15.83 ± 39.98 ml/min, ( P = 0.041) during dapagliflozin treatment, whereas the 7.94 ± 20.73 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 reduction in normalized RPF was borderline significant ( P = 0.052).