“borderline significant”

For Pb, a borderline significant difference was detected ( p = 0.050), with tub gurnard showing slightly higher mean values; however, this finding is limited by the high proportion of missing Pb data (68.1%).

However, the sex interaction P -values were only borderline significant ( P = 0.05–0.11) due to lack of statistical power, except for AF-PRS post-PCI ( P = 0.003).

Evaluation of systemic markers of inflammation (hs-CRP, IL-6, IL-8 and fibrinogen) only revealed a borderline significant decrease in plasma hs-CRP concentration after doxycycline treatment (−0.51 μg/ml, P =0.050; Table 3 ).

The difference in mean triglyceride level in the placebo group was not significant after the intervention, although there was a borderline significant difference in the intervention group (p=0.05); nevertheless, the changes in mean triglyceride level between the two groups did not indicate a significant difference.

However, catecholamine status at the ET was borderline significant for OS ( P = .05; Fig 3 J).

For upper extremity strength there was a borderline significant multivariate time effect (F 3,36 = 2.87; p = 0.050; partial Eta 2 = 0.193) with significant univariate improvement for concentric (F 1,38 = 5.41; p = 0.025; partial Eta 2 = 0.125) and eccentric (F 1,38 = 6.58; p = 0.014; partial Eta 2 = 0.148).

A borderline significant association towards higher risk of shorter disease-free survival of the patients with lower expression of RRM2 was apparent ( p = 0.050, Additional file 1 : Figure S8).

23 This meta-analysis showed that the control group exhibited a significant reduction in the plaque score at 6 months ( P < .001) and a borderline significant decrease in overall changes compared with the MI group ( P = .05).

For progression to NV, a similar effect of BMI for type 1 carriers versus noncarriers was not seen: the effect of BMI among carriers was not significant (OR = 0.6; 95% CI = 0.2, 1.9; P = 0.33), whereas it was borderline significant among noncarriers (OR = 1.2; 95% CI = 1.0, 1.4; P = 0.05).

We saw a significant increase in child’s weight overtime for both group ( p -value = 0.023), and there was borderline significant difference in the weight change from baseline between intervention and comparison group ( p -value = 0.050).

Outcome percentage SDAI/CDAI/Boolean remission Targeting SDAI/CDAI-LDA significantly improved the percentage of patients in SDAI/CDAI/Boolean remission compared with both DAS-LDA and DAS-remission targets, after 1 year (borderline significant for DAS-LDA) and 2–3 years (year 1: 34% p=0.05 and 35% p=0.03 for comparison to DAS-LDA and DAS-remission respectively, year 2–3: 31% p=0.0002 and 36% p<0.0001) (see figure 2D and online supplemental tables S2 and S3 ).

There was a borderline significant relationship between higher levels of donor INS ‐cfDNA and lower islet yield [−0.38 (0.18), p = .050] (Table 2 ).

IMT-CCA (borderline significant) and IMT-bulb at baseline were related to the change in plaque area over the 5 years (Spearman ́s rho = 0.13 and p -value = 0.050 for IMT-CCA and rho = 0.21 and p -value = 0.0036 for IMT-bulb.

Although primiparous mothers had higher IgA concentration in colostrum (6.58 ± 1.30 g/L) than multiparous mothers (5.58 ± 1.50 g/L), yet the difference reached at borderline significant ( P = 0.05).

Results were considered statistically significant at P < 0.05, with P values for borderline significant results approaching P = 0.05 also reported.

SBP was borderline significant for predicting adverse CV events (p = 0.05).

Within the patient cohort, performance on the pitch direction and tonal expectancy tasks showed a borderline significant correlation ( P = 0.05, rho = 0.31; analyses of tonal expectancy performance were adjusted for pitch direction score).

There was no significant difference between the four groups in the baseline condition of Schober’s test before the training programmes ( p = 0.358) and the difference was borderline significant between the four groups ( p = 0.050) after the training period.

Furthermore, when analyzed as a continuous variable, higher CRP levels showed a borderline significant association with an increased risk of mortality (aOR = 1.038, 95% CI (1.000, 1.077), p = 0.050), but not with any of the other outcomes ( Table 3 ).

Associations Between Histological Parameters and OVT on Broiler Level On broiler level, a linear mixed model revealed a significant association between the OVT concentration and the villus length ( P = 0.044) and a borderline significant association between the OVT concentration and the villus-to-crypt ratio ( P = 0.050) ( Figure 3 ).

For UCDVA, a borderline significant correlation was observed with IOL decentration (r = 0.14, p = 0.05; 95% CI: 0.002–0.27), whereas tilt was not associated (r = 0.0006, p = 0.99).

FGA rs6050 genotypes were similarly distributed in the whole cases and controls, reaching borderline significant results by comparing the allele frequency in the RPL subgroup (OR = 0.58; 0.33–1.0; P = 0.05).

A significant positive effect of the WP compared to the PAP was observed on D-QoL-positive affect, beta (95%CI) = 0.23 (0.06; 0.39), P < 0.01 and a borderline significant positive effect on D-QoL-self esteem, beta (95%CI) = 0.17 (0.001; 0.34), P = 0.05.

Figure 4 , A, confirmed a statistically significant association between maximum Pa o 2 and death (Wald χ 2 = 8.72, df = 3, P = .033) and borderline significant nonlinearity (Wald χ 2 = 5.81, df = 2, P = .05).

To broaden our search, we also decided to include and describe results with p values that were borderline significant, i.e. 0.10 > p > 0.05.