“borderline significant”

Better performance was noted on the CE-SDCT with a borderline significant difference (P = 0.05) for senior radiology resident.

In addition, while the AUC of DNI in patients with USG abnormalities was borderline significant ( P = 0.05) it was nearly comparable to that of CRP, both of which being much more significant than either the WBC count and ESR.

Although there was a tendency for Lactobacillus populations to increase after chitosan supplementation, the mean change in the amount of this microbial agent in the chitosan versus placebo group was estimated as borderline significant ( P = 0.05).

Colorectal cancer showed borderline significant associations between the highest EC ELTD1 scores (score 4) and tumor differentiation status (p = 0.05; Table S7 ) and improved overall survival ( Figure S4 E).

However, there were significant differences ( p < 0.05) in age, education, and years of experience (work tenure), and a borderline significant difference in gender between groups ( p = 0.050).

Evaluation of systemic markers of inflammation (hs-CRP, IL-6, IL-8 and fibrinogen) only revealed a borderline significant decrease in plasma hs-CRP concentration after doxycycline treatment (−0.51 μg/ml, P =0.050; Table 3 ).

However, educational level was found to be borderline significant ( p = 0.05).

However, there was a borderline significant difference in gender distribution between the clusters ( χ 2 1 =3.84; P =.05).

Furthermore, high stress levels showed a borderline significant association with the risk of abdominal obesity only in women (HR: 1.27, 95% CI: 1.00–1.59, p < 0.05).

For progression to NV, a similar effect of BMI for type 1 carriers versus noncarriers was not seen: the effect of BMI among carriers was not significant (OR = 0.6; 95% CI = 0.2, 1.9; P = 0.33), whereas it was borderline significant among noncarriers (OR = 1.2; 95% CI = 1.0, 1.4; P = 0.05).

A borderline significant P -value was also found in T status ( P =0.05).

Notably, C18:1N9T (trans-oleic acid) was lower in HS than in AS and SS, with a borderline significant difference ( p = 0.050).

The (CAG) 25+8 allele contracted at a frequency that is statistically significantly above background ( P = 0.006), while the (TAG) 25+8 contraction frequency compared to background is only borderline significant ( P = 0.05; entries 10I and J in Table 1 ).

The association of plasma docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) levels with the risk of POAG was borderline significant (hazard ratio, 0.42; 95% confidence interval, 0.17–1.01; P = 0.05).

The same trend was noticed for HOMA-IR but the difference was borderline significant (p=0.05).

Only the between group difference in BMI was borderline significant ( p = 0.05).

PRDX1 protein expression correlated with smaller tumor size ( P = 0.011), low tumor grade ( P = 0.002), negative Ki67 status ( P = 0.004) and lobular subtype ( P = 0.003), whilst there was a borderline significant correlation with positive ER status ( P = 0.05).

There was also a borderline significant difference in patients being labeled as a psychiatric case ( P = 0.05).

We saw a significant increase in child’s weight overtime for both group ( p -value = 0.023), and there was borderline significant difference in the weight change from baseline between intervention and comparison group ( p -value = 0.050).

Outcome percentage SDAI/CDAI/Boolean remission Targeting SDAI/CDAI-LDA significantly improved the percentage of patients in SDAI/CDAI/Boolean remission compared with both DAS-LDA and DAS-remission targets, after 1 year (borderline significant for DAS-LDA) and 2–3 years (year 1: 34% p=0.05 and 35% p=0.03 for comparison to DAS-LDA and DAS-remission respectively, year 2–3: 31% p=0.0002 and 36% p<0.0001) (see figure 2D and online supplemental tables S2 and S3 ).

A borderline significant decrease was observed in all motility parameters VSL, VCL, VAP, DSL, DAP, ALH, BCF, LIN, STR, WOB in the EMR group at p = 0.05.

BMP10 showed a borderline significant protective association in the model adjusted for age and sex (HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.33–1.00, P = 0.050) ( Table 7 , Figure 1 , Panel C).

A borderline significant negative association with rheumatologic diseases was also observed (aOR 0.77 [95% CI 0.59–1.00]; p = 0.05).

Regarding school-indoor average noise levels, individual average noise exposure in classrooms was associated with a slower improvement of inattentiveness in unadjusted models and was borderline significant in adjusted models and of similar magnitude to results with outdoor levels: β = 2.41 ms (95% CI: 0.00, 4.81, p -value = 0.050) per 5 dB (adjusted model).

The reduction in missed medication was borderline significant ( P =.05).