“borderline significant”

Similarly, we found a borderline significant association between psychological ULL scores and DASH scores ( p = 0.05), but not with ΔVolume ( Figures 1 E,H, respectively).

After adjustment for sex, BSA remained a significant correlate of LVEDID, LVEDL and LVEDV (p<0.01 for all), and also remained a borderline significant correlate of LV mass (p<0.05), but was no longer a correlate of LV end-diastolic external diameter.

Overall time had a borderline significant difference ( p = 0.05) for patients with a Q12-16 response (Table 3 , Fig. 5 ).

RV free wall mean strain also showed a slight although borderline significant deterioration (from −16.9 ± 5.6% to −15.7 ± 4.1%; p = 0.05).

After accounting for competing mortality, there were borderline significant differences observed across the group of PGS _ FNBMD ldpred for MOF (p = 0.05), but not for HF (p = 0.71).

Gender was found to be borderline significant in univariate analysis ( p = 0.05) but not significant in multivariate models, which is in line with our findings regarding gender 31 .

Evaluation of systemic markers of inflammation (hs-CRP, IL-6, IL-8 and fibrinogen) only revealed a borderline significant decrease in plasma hs-CRP concentration after doxycycline treatment (−0.51 μg/ml, P =0.050; Table 3 ).

The difference for SF-36 physical functioning was borderline significant (−4.10; p = 0.05) (Table 4 ).

The reduced rates of non-severe hypoglycaemia with regular human insulin were only borderline significant ( p = 0.05), with no clear differences among the insulin analogues lispro, glulisine and aspart.

The main result for the primary outcome is borderline significant (RR=0.85 [0.72-1.00], p=0.05), it is difficult to interpret this result.

Multivariate analyses In the multivariate analyses (Table 2 ), high expression of miR-141 (TE + TS) was borderline significant for BFFS (HR = 1.07 95% CI 1.00–1.14, p = 0.050), not with CFFS (HR = 2.32 95% CI 0.94–5.73, p = 0.068).

Improved survival was borderline significant in cases with a KPS ≥ 80 ( p = 0.05).

The distribution of patients across plasma 25(OH)D groups (deficient, optimal) presented a borderline significant difference ( p = 0.05) between case and control groups with higher distribution of patients with autoimmune diseases in deficient vitamin D group.

Our results showed a significant excess of nonsynonymous variants ( P = 0.047) in the Kinh population from Vietnam and a borderline significant excess of amino acid variation (0.1 ≥ P ≥ 0.05) in other populations of African (African Americans and the Mende), South Asian (Bengali, Gujarati, Telugu, Punjabi and Sri Lankan Tamil), European (Finnish, Great British, and Iberian), and East Asian (Dai and southern Han Chinese) ancestry (Table 1 ).

Items that showed significant or borderline significant association with abortion (p< 0.05 and p<0.1, respectively) were put into multivariate analysis.

Although RMT also showed a trend toward improved quality of life (SMD 1.00, 95% CI 0.00-1.99; P = .05), this result was borderline significant and derived from only three studies and should therefore be interpreted cautiously.

Before carrying out a leave-one-out sensitivity analysis, the association between use of PPI and mortality was found to be borderline significant (OR 1.12 [1.00, 1.25]; I 2 85%, p = 0.05), Figure 4 . 3.4.

LogMar treated eye was borderline significant ( P = 0.05, CI = -8.99, 0.06) (Table 6 ).

A Friedman test shows a borderline significant difference in pressure pain thresholds between the groups ( p = 0.050).When groups are tested pairwise with a Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test, statistically significant differences can be found.

36.1/month, p = 0.004), and there was a borderline significant increase in presentations with SSI (7.8/month vs. 11.3/month, p = 0.05).

The final multivariate multiple regression model for veterinarians’ design preferences identified one borderline significant association ( P = 0.05; 1 − Wilks’ lambda = 0.13) between the covariate describing whether veterinary practices were also servicing pig herds and veterinarians’ relative preference of program attributes.

We also found greater flexor tendon excursion in the patients with CTS than in the healthy volunteers, especially in the wrist extension position, although the difference was only borderline significant ( p = 0.05; Table 3 ).

However, with respect to age, the borderline significant occurrence of younger patients in the limited patient cohort was observed ( p =0.05).

Post hoc t -tests showed no difference between MDD and HC before treatment ( t (62) = −0.46, p = 0.644, Cohen’s d = 0.11), but a borderline significant difference after treatment ( t (62) = 1.99, p = 0.050, Cohen’s d = 0.51).

This finding was consistent in sensitivity analysis (SMD ranged from 0.09 to 0.29), although exclusion of the UC subgroup from the Patel study ( 42 ) resulted in a borderline significant difference favoring higher sVCAM-1 levels in the active disease group (SMD 0.29, 95% CI –0.001 to 0.58, p=0.050).