Barely Significant
← all phrases

“borderline significant”

11,410 sentences · 11,410 papers · 14,072 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
borderline significantp = 0.081.6× alphagold
The difference in risk of relapse between the G2I-1 and G2I-2 tumors was borderline significant (Odd ratio: 0.16 [0.2-1.2] p = 0.08) whereas that between the G2I-2 and G2I-3 tumors was highly significant (odd ratio: 8.5 [3.2-22.6] p < 0.001) in univariate analysis.
borderline significantp = 1.29 × 10 −30.0× alphagold
A one-sided t-test on the personal axis is borderline significant ( μ : 57.35, σ : 8.53, CI : [53.94, 60.77], t (23) = 4.22, p = 1.29 × 10 −3 , d = 0.86).
The political preferences of LLMs.
PLoS One · 2024 · PMC11290627
highly significantp = 0.0020.0× alphaqualifiedgold
borderline significantp = 0.0551.1× alphagold
We indeed found a highly significant enrichment of R151C in melanoma cases compared to non-cancer controls (p = 0.002, Fisher’s exact test, Supplementary Table S3 ) and borderline significant enrichment of V92M (p = 0.055, Fisher’s exact test) and R160W (p = 0.053, Fisher’s exact test).
borderline significantp < 0.0030.1× alphagold
Post-intervention, clinicians were more likely to report using the 75 g oral glucose tolerance test most commonly for first-trimester screening (although the change was borderline significant on multivariable analysis: baseline 50%, post-intervention 74%, crude p < 0.003; multivariable adjusted p = 0.06).
nominally significantp = 0.0030.1× alphagold
borderline significantp = 0.0611.2× alphagold
S1 ) and even succeeded in replicating the nominally significant difference between NG and IFG groups in has-let-7a levels (p = 0.003, FC = 0.97) and the borderline significant result in hsa-miR-144-5p levels (p = 0.061, FC = 0.91) in the same setting.
borderline significantp = 0.0030.1× alphagold
Amongst black patients, plaque prevalence was 36.7% and the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was not associated with plaque presence for the MDRD equation (p = 0.3), whereas the respective relationship was significant or borderline significant (p = 0.003 to 0.08) and of similar extent (p>0.1 for comparisons of AUC (SE)) for the other 8 equations.
borderline significantP =0.00390.1× alphagold
During social preference testing, time spent sniffing a stranger mouse was greater than time spent sniffing the empty side in both WT and SEY mice, albeit the difference in SEY mice being only borderline significant (Wilcoxon signed-rank test, P =0.0039 for WT and P =0.0443 for SEY).
borderline significantp = .00390.1× alphagold
Additionally, the two age cohorts in the NHI group performed comparably, except for subtests targeting phonological processing and/or memory (independent-samples two-tailed Welch t-tests: Discourse Comprehension, t = -3.47, p = .001; Nonword Repetition, t = -4.17, p < .001; Sentence Production, t = -4.01, p < .001; and borderline significant for Sentence Repetition, t = -3.01, p = .0039), with significance value Bonferroni-corrected to p = .05/13 = .0038.
borderline significantp value = 0.00490.1× alphagold
These analyses show significant or borderline significant enrichment of several pathways related to hypertension in plasma, namely steroid hormone biosynthesis (combined p value = 0.0049), primary bile acid biosynthesis (combined p value = 0.063), and arachidonic acid metabolism (combined p value = 0.084) for plasma and purine metabolism in urine (combined p value = 0.0071).
highly significantp values <0.0050.1× alphaqualifiedgold
The differences were considered as ‘not significant’ in cases with p values >0.1, as ‘borderline significant’ (significant*), with p values between 0.1 and 0.05, as ‘significant’ (significant**) with p values between 0.05 and 0.005 and as ‘highly significant’ (significant***) with p values <0.005.
highly significantp -values ≤ 0.0050.1× alphaqualifiedgold
Differences were considered as “highly significant” in cases with p -values ≤ 0.005, as “significant” with p -values ≤ 0.05, as “borderline significant” with p -values between 0.05 and 0.1, and as “not significant” (n.s.) with p -values ≥ 0.1.
borderline significantP = 0.0050.1× alphagold
Cochran’s Q test did not indicate notable heterogeneity in any of the CSF metabolites tested, and all MR-Egger intercept tests were non-significant (P > 0.05), with the exception of myo-inositol, which showed a borderline significant intercept (P = 0.005), suggesting potential pleiotropic bias for this trait.