“borderline significant”

There was a highly significant, inverse correlation of V A with NT-proBNP (r = -0.21; p < 0.001) and cardiothoracic ratio (r = -0.39; p < 0.001), and a weaker borderline significant correlation with LVEF (r = +0.11; p = 0.054).

In women, cheese consumption in the highest quintile (Q5 median: 94 g/d) was associated with a borderline significant lower odds in MetS compared with the lowest (OR: 0.73, 95% CI: 0.54, 1.00, P -trend = 0.046, quadratic term P value <0.001, model 2) quintile (Q1 median: 10.8 g/d).

There was also a directionally similar borderline significant difference between inverted faces and angry faces ( Mdn = 261.68 ms), Z = 2.50, p = .001, r = .30.

The difference in risk of relapse between the G2I-1 and G2I-2 tumors was borderline significant (Odd ratio: 0.16 [0.2-1.2] p = 0.08) whereas that between the G2I-2 and G2I-3 tumors was highly significant (odd ratio: 8.5 [3.2-22.6] p < 0.001) in univariate analysis.

In addition to the ci-miRNAs that passed the bonferroni cut-off (P<0.00032), 4 borderline significant ci-miRNAs (miR-145, miR-424, miR-133a, miR-133b) (P<0.001), were also identified ( Figure 2 and Figure 3 ).

Studies assessing environmental exposures (rodent presence, poor food storage, housing conditions) showed a pooled odds ratio (OR) of 2.18 (95% CI: 1.73–2.76, p = 0.40), while occupational exposures, such as working in healthcare or slaughterhouse settings, had a pooled OR of 1.29 (95% CI: 0.84–1.98, p = 0.05), also demonstrating a borderline significant association and demographic factors (age, gender) yielded a pooled OR of 1.13 (95% CI: 0.93–1.37, p < 0.001).

The effect of prune intervention in postmenopausal women was borderline significant at the lumbar spine, with BMD slightly higher in the intervention group (SMD [95% CI] = 1.30 [−0.03, 2.63]; I 2 = 98%; p < 0.001).

The presence of CVD had a borderline significant influence on patient survival ( Table 3 ), and the positive association between the presence of CVD and DM was highly significant (odds ratio = 7.224, P <0.001).

Although CEA did not achieve statistical significance in the final multivariate model (P = 0.075), it was retained due to its established clinical relevance and borderline significant association in univariate analysis (HR = 1.009, 95% CI: 1.006–1.012, P < 0.001).

In the stationary beam test, HET animals covered a lower number of segments (58/2: 6 months t(34) = 3.360, p = 0.002; 9 months, borderline significant; 12 months t(20) = 3.929, p = 0.001; 58/4: 3 months t(9) = 4.236, p = 0.002; 6 months t(20) = 3.403, p = 0.003; 9 months t(15) = 2.916, p = 0.010; 12 months t(16) = 2.916, p = 0.010), thus traveling a shorter distance, and had a higher number of falls than WT animals ( Table 1 ).

Statistical significance was defined as ‘not significant’ (p>0.10), ‘borderline significant’ (*p<0.1), ‘significant’ (**p<0.05), ‘very significant’ (***p<0.01), or ‘highly significant’ (****p<0.001).

In addition, despite the presence of the correlation between total 25(OH)D and bone-specific alkaline phosphatase and vitamin B6, it was borderline significant, in contrast to free 25(OH)D, which was correlated with these parameters with p < 0.001.

At 36 months, significant and borderline significant declines in qHBsAg, respectively, were noted in the group A (p<0.001) and in group B (p = 0.068) patients ( Fig 2B ).

The results revealed that the hypothyroidism could reduce the risk of breast cancer was borderline significant (OR:0.96 95%CI:0.92–1.00, P < 0.001), and there was no heterogeneity(I 2 = 0, P = 0.577).

Likewise, the adjusted risk of death without prior ICD therapy was significantly higher in the low-ANSS group, and higher, albeit borderline significant, in the intermediate-ANSS group compared with the high-ANSS group (HR: 2.29; p = 0.001, and HR: 1.58; p = 0.06, respectively) ( Table 3 ). 3.5.

Furthermore, F-tests for the LMMs were highly significant for the directional offset from spiralA ( p = 0.001), and borderline significant for hlineL and zigzagA ( ps = 0.06), to the VMI MC score and insignificant for the spatial offsets, when age was included in the model.

BME in the posterior-medial tibia, PHLM tears, and MCL tears were statistically significantly associated with ALL tears; LCL tears were borderline significant ( p < 0.001–0.003, Table 4 ).

In addition, there was a highly significant (P<0.001) association between fascin expression and decreased disease-free survival ( Figure 1A ), but the association with the overall survival ( Figure 1B ) was borderline significant (P = 0.058).

For the analysis of seasonality based on month of diagnosis, the heterogeneity test detected a borderline significant departure from the uniform distribution in astrocytoma ( P =0.09) and a highly significant departure for other CNS ( P =0.001) ( Table 7 ).

In Spain, there was a borderline significant increase in the OR of IPD in people over 64 years ( p ≤ 0.001).

This difference was significant for A-07 and U-25 tumors ( P = .035 and P = .026, respectively; Figure 3 C ), borderline significant for D-12 and R-18 tumors ( P = .13 and P = .14, respectively; Figure 3 C ), and highly significant when A-07, U-25, D-12, and R-18 tumors were pooled together ( P < .001; Figure 3 D ).

We found a borderline significant association of STEMI diagnosis with stroke, with a RR 1.42 (95% CI 0.96–2.10), and a high heterogeneity (I 2 = 97%, p < 0.001).

The pairwise comparison revealed that there was no significant difference between the adolescent group and the youth group (P = 0.711), the youth group > the middle-aged group (P < 0.04), and the middle-aged group > the old-aged group (P = 0.005); neutrophils H(3) = 16.854, p < 0.001, the difference between the four groups was statistically significant, pairwise comparisons revealed that the adolescent group <youth group (P=0.006), no significant difference between the youth group and middle-aged group (P=0.844), and the middle-aged group <elderly group (P=0.050) was borderline significant; monocyte H(3) =17.489, P<0.001, the difference between the four groups was statistically significant, and pairwise comparisons revealed that the elderly group >middle-aged group (P<0.001), the elderly group > the youth group (P = 0.017), the adolescent group > the middle-aged group (P = 0.005).

While the correlations between ccf-mtDNA and mtND1 -cn and mtCOX1 -cn were non-significant or borderline significant, a significant inverse correlation was observed between mtND4 -cn and ccf-mtDNA (rho = −0.49, p = 0.001).

Results We observed a borderline significant ( p = 0.06) reduction in 5hmC levels in PC compared to NM tissue samples, which was explained by a highly significant ( p < 0.001) loss of 5hmC in ERG− PCs.