“borderline significant”

Relative to the two preceding years, a borderline significant stage shift was observed with an increase of stage IV tumours at the expense of stage I-III tumours ( p = 0.093).

The difference in survival between patients where the CTC-E phenotype was present during follow-up and patients where only the CTC-M phenotype was present was borderline significant (log-rank test: p = 0.093).

It should be noted, however, that the difference in polymorphism densities around COs between zip3 ∆ and zip3 ∆ msh2 ∆ was only borderline significant ( P = 0.093, two-sample KS test), likely due to the low numbers of COs observed in the latter strain.

Interaction was observed between gender and condom use at first intercourse ( p = 0.003), and was borderline significant for gender and maternal educational ≥ college ( p = 0.094).

Furthermore, a two-by-two paired t-test for the data was performed at different lock time levels, and we found that the mean task completion time of the participants at the 200 ms level was significantly different from those at the 300, 400, and 600 ms levels ( p < 0.05) and borderline significant compared with the mean task completion time at 500 ms ( p = 0.094).

In the “Genetic risk groups”, the adverse prognosis category (HR 2.85, 95% CI 1.05–7.75, p = 0.040, Wald) was associated with a higher risk of mortality, while a favorable prognosis was borderline significant (HR 0.39, 95% CI 0.13–1.17, p = 0.094, Wald), and was further included in the multivariate analysis.

The main limitations of this study were as follows: the inclusion of immediate-release metformin doses only and the absence of a covariance matrix in the simulation, given the borderline significant positive correlation between TBW and CrCl ( P = 0.094).

non-contact) showed a borderline significant association ( p = 0.094, OR = 0.756, 95% CI: 0.545–1.049), suggesting a potential trend towards non-contact injuries being more likely to result in ACL rupture compared to contact injuries.

By 2-way ANCOVA, the rhGH x rosiglitazone interaction was borderline significant (P = 0.094).

0 [−0.2 to 0.2], with a median difference of 0.2 [0 to 0.4], p = 0.0277), whilst the effect for the right leg was borderline significant (0.2 [0 to 0.4] vs. 0 [−0.2 to 0.1], with a median difference of 0.2 [0 to 0.3], p = 0.0944) ( Table 4 ).

There was one borderline significant difference regarding sociodemographic characteristics: mothers who were research dropouts had a somewhat lower level of education ( p = 0.095).

These results became borderline significant after correction for age: F (1,26) = 2.99, p = 0.095, partial eta squared = 0.103.

A borderline significant difference was observed in the frequency of the G allele between asthmatic and non-asthmatic individuals ( p =0.0950).

However, there were significant group effects on sTfR ( P = 0.046) and BIS ( P = 0.024) and a borderline significant group effect on SF ( P = 0.095).

OS was significantly longer for patients with LS and remained borderline significant after adjusting for the effect of age and stage (HR=1.96, p=0.095).

N stage revealed a borderline significant association with DFS ( P =0.095).

In the multivariate linear regression analysis, RRI showed a borderline significant negative association with adjusted GFR ( β = −112.67; p = 0.095), though the overall model was not statistically significant ( p = 0.23).

In addition, there was a weak, borderline significant ( p = 0.095) inverse association with consumption of legumes.

However, adjusting the effects of NLR and MLR for each other gives only borderline significant effects ( p = 0.095 and 0.055, respectively, adjusted for age and gender; p = 0.040 and 0.054 unadjusted for age and sex) as they are highly correlated (Spearman’s rho = 0.78, p < 0.001).

Table 3) sub-analyses of baseline clinical and laboratory variables in viral and nonviral populations retrieved overlapping results to the overall population, with the sole exception of AFP <400 ng/mL in nonviral patients being borderline significant (HR 0.69, p = 0.0953).

7 8 We detected a borderline significant effect of ibudilast on WM fraction (t(99.7)=1.68, p=0.096), and no effect on GM fraction (t(99.9)=1.33, p=0.187).

In our study, compared with prepandemic period, there was a borderline significant decrease in the admission rate of patients with acute cholecystitis from 17.3% to 13.0% (p=0.096).

However, the presence of less than six AMY1 copies showed a borderline significant association with obesity (OR = 1.521; 95% CI = 0.928–2.495; P = 0.096), and individuals with a low number of AMY1 copies (≤4) had a significantly higher risk of obesity than those with a high number (≥10) of AMY1 copies (OR = 1.536; 95% CI = 1.019–2.313, P = 0.040) ( Table 2 ).

The association between age and survival was borderline significant both in univariate analysis of the three groups ( P =0.096), and in Cox regression analysis with age as a continuous variable ( P =0.093).

TTA was also influenced by resistance patterns, showing a borderline significant association in the pre-intervention group ( P = 0.096), though this was not observed in intervention phase ( P = 0.449).