“borderline significant”

In models that included age, gender, body mass index, smoking status, history of cardiovascular disease, hypertension, dyslipidemia, HbA1c, baseline eGFR, and albuminuria, PSQ showed a borderline significant association with decline in renal function in the diabetic group (HR 2.15, 95% CI 0.88–5.23, p = 0.091) (Model 1).

The age difference between patients less than 50 years and 50 years or older was highly significant for all three survival outcomes (p < 0.002) while only a borderline significant difference was observed between pre- and post-menopausal status in disease free survival only (p = 0.091).

Weight was borderline significant (β = 1.003, p = 0.091), indicating a potential positive trend towards higher weight being associated with increased pain.

Year of study was borderline significant (Wilks' Lambda = 0.95; F = 1.72; P = 0.091; η = 0.023), and neither gender nor academic level had an impact on any of the SSEIT domains ( P > 0.05 for all values) [ Table 3 ].

The TXB showed only a borderline significant treatment effect ( p = 0.091). 3.3.

The OS rate was lower in patients with STAS compared with patients without STAS, and there was a borderline significant difference ( P = 0.091).

Cluster 3 showed a borderline significant (Fisher test p = 0.0913) enrichment of better progression-free survival values (between 61 and 100 months).

In multivariate analysis, infiltrative HCC was an independent predictor of shorter TTF (HR: 1.34; 95% CI: 1.00–1.78; p = 0.049; Table 2 ) and was borderline significant in predicting a shorter OS (HR: 1.30; 95% CI: 0.96–1.75; p = 0.092; Table 2 ).

Moreover, IHC analysis revealed a borderline significant difference in the proportion of myeloid CD33 + cells in the tumor subgroups (Fisher's exact test; P = 0.092; Fig. 4B ), with the ECM3 + /IFN − subgroup comprising the lowest fraction of HGBCs classified in the CD33 low category, as well as the highest fraction of samples that did not express activation markers (such as PD‐1; Fig. 4C ).

Ownership of a plot hut was borderline significant in the univariable analysis for P. vivax (p = 0.092, see Additional file 1 : Table S2).

Comparison between MS and Seronegative NMOSD Only one peptide (GAGGAGAGGAGAGGG) for antigen type EBV-EBNA1 showed a borderline significant difference in IgG responses between the MS and seronegative NMOSD groups (5.52 FU, p = 0.092, data not shown). 3.3.3.

A borderline significant difference was observed in the percentage of BMI changes between the two surgical approaches ( t = 1.79, p = 0.092), with ablative surgeries showing a greater tendency for BMI increase.

We found the interaction effect of the Trait‐Anxiety×group was significant in all‐cause mortality (β=0.349; P =0.048) and all‐cause readmission or death (β=0.118; P =0.048), as well as borderline significant in cardiac readmission or death (β=0.096; P =0.092).

There was a borderline significant interaction ( p = 0.092) between nuts consumption and diabetes in relation to MRT ( Figure 2 ).

We also found that the ASQ total was a borderline significant predictor of high anxiety/low depression versus high depression/low anxiety (p=0.092; OR, 95% CI 1.1, 0.98 to 1.2 associated with a 10-unit increase in ASQ total score).

Relative risk of diabetes increased following radiotherapy ( p < 0.001), and there was a borderline significant increasing trend per treatment ( p = 0.092).

Correlation analysis We determined that the average amplitudes of P3 evoked by inclusion were not significant and negatively correlated with BDI scales ( r = –0.234, P > 0.05), but were borderline significant and negatively correlated with the scores of anhedonia items ( r = –0.331, P = 0.092), which suggested that with higher scores of anhedonia items, P3 amplitudes would be lower.

This association was found to be borderline significant with P = 0.093.

Among job resources, high (vs low) social support significantly increased the likelihood of working longer, while the contribution of high (vs low) work-time control was borderline significant ( p = .093) in the adjusted model.

Further, in Cox proportional hazard models that take into account VL, the HR remained high (2.18 and 3.12 respectively) and p values continued to trend or remain borderline significant (p = 0.093 and 0.051) ( Table 2 ), indicating that both VL and RC can independently affect CD4 loss.

After patients with prior therapy were excluded, patients with high baseline uEGF/Cr were still more likely to achieve CR of proteinuria (Supplementary Table S3 , adjusted HR 1.96, 95% CI: 0.89–4.28), although the result was borderline significant ( p = 0.093).

The relationship between knowledge and Mets was borderline significant (p=0.093).

For the target population, distributions of TNM stage were borderline significant between the two groups after intervention ( P = .093).

observed a borderline significant decrement in reclassification with the DOAC score relative to the ORBIT score for major bleeding, with an NRI of –11.2% (95% CI, –26.2% to 0.8%; p = 0.093) and an IDI of –1.2% (95% CI, –2.5% to 0%; p = 0.004), while no improvement was noted compared with HAS‐BLED.

For GALNT2 , an average but borderline significant 0.52 mmol/L HDLc increase was observed in 10 total GALNT2 mutation carriers vs. 11 first-degree controls (+34.2%, p = 0.093), suggesting that either GALNT2 mutations have weaker or more variable effects than LIPG and CETP mutations on HDLc elevation and/or these families have insufficient power for detecting significant GALNT2 mutation associations with increased HDLc.