“borderline significant”

In addition, the association for Cornell ECG-based LVH and inferior TWI was borderline significant [OR: 1.88 (95% CI: 0.97–3.63) and 2.44 (95% CI: 0.98–6.08); p -values = 0.061 and 0.056, respectively].

In the 55–74 year-old age group, only adults with a moderate or worse obstructive impairment were significantly more likely to have an elevated risk for cardiovascular disease, although participants with a restrictive impairment had a borderline significant increased risk for cardiovascular disease (p = 0.061).

NT-proBNP showed a borderline significant association with high AF burden (OR 2.02, p = 0.061) ( Table 3 , Figure 4 ).

Breast depth in supine setup and weight were borderline significant, p = 0.061 and p = 0.063, respectively.

In this latter group, the most represented genotype was the (CCTTT) 10/12 genotype that showed a significantly higher frequency when compared with MCS patients (20 versus 2.5%; P = 0.0044) and a borderline significant difference when compared with controls (20 versus 6.7%; P = 0.061), while frequencies in SMCS patients and controls were similar (6.3% versus 6.7%, P > 0.05).

The group effect was borderline significant, F (2, 65) = 2.90, p = 0.061, with a partial η 2 ≈ 0.08 and a corresponding Cohen’s f ≈ 0.30.

The interaction between arsenic and smoking prevalence was borderline significant ( P = 0.0611) when comparing quantiles in the model adjusted only for smoking prevalence ( Figure 2 , left).

We found a borderline significant association (possibly due to the small sample size) of the rs2535913 minor allele (A) with short LTL (β=−0.0343; p=6.13×10 −2 ; table 1 ).

In contrast to RWPE-1-AR, in LNCaP-pcDNA3.1 cells, only the androgen response pathway was borderline significant in GSEA (B–H adjusted P = 0.0614) when comparing 100 with 0 nM DHT (Supplementary Table 12).

10 The interaction effect between PD-(L)1 and VEGF inhibitors was borderline significant for PFS ( P = 0.0614) in our meta-analysis, hence effect sizes were estimated separately according to the use of anti-VEGF therapy.

There were no significant differences in age, etiology, QRSd, LVEF and baseline rhythm between the LBBB and NICD subgroups, however the QRSd was longer in the LBBB subgroup in a borderline significant manner (171 ± 23.45 vs . 162.2 ± 24.97 ms, P = 0.0617).

Additionally, lower pressure pain thresholds exhibited a borderline significant association with elevated TLR-4 inflammatory responses ( p = 0.062), while a significant correlation was observed with increased plasma IL-6 levels ( p = 0.031).

However, by three months, a borderline significant reduction in AL was observed in the LLRL group compared to the control group (estimate: -0.154; 95% CI: -0.282 to 0.026; p = 0.062) (Figure 4C ).

Patients diagnosed with MDSCC had higher loco recurrence but it was borderline significant risk ( P = 0.062) ( Table 4 ).

Age and V20 were significantly associated with RP risk (grade ≥ 2), while surgery had a borderline significant effect ( P = 0.062) on RP development.

This change was borderline significant ( p = 0.062), pointing to a downward trend.

The analysis revealed that the first discriminant function significantly differentiated between the strategy groups (df = 12, Wilks' Lambda = 0.816, p < 0.001), while the second discriminant function was borderline significant (df = 6, Wilks' Lambda = 0.954, p = 0.062).

Moreover, the severity of COVID-19 symptoms showed a borderline significant association ( p = 0.062) in patients with higher adherence to a vegetarian diet ( Table 2 ).

The psychological domain showed a borderline significant negative association (β = −2.03, 95% CI: −4.16 to 0.10, p = 0.062).

Positive Autoantibodies at the 2nd blood draw were not significantly related to response, as defined by DCR or ORR (Table 4 ), although borderline significant when adjusted for cancer type (DCR: RD = −0.332 95% CI −0.682 to 0.017, p = 0.062).

Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analyses further confirmed that age (HR = 2.687; 95%CI = 1.156–6.244; P = 0.022) and EBV DNA (HR = 3.269; 95%CI = 1.383–7.728; P = 0.007) were highly significant prognostic factors for OS, and SUV max of patients with distant recurrence was borderline significant (HR = 2.415; 95%CI = 0.956–6.101; P = 0.062).

Estimates reported in the second panel of Table 3 indicate a significant and positive effect on participants' decision‐making skills (p = .009) and a borderline significant effect on perceived connection to peers (p = .062).

As shown in Supplementary Table iii, the interaction of the SNP rs8044769 and age had a borderline significant association with OA risk (interaction p=0.062).

Furthermore, BMI, systolic BP, and total cholesterol were significantly associated with carotid plaque; meanwhile, serum Nrg4 levels showed a borderline significant association with carotid plaque (p = 0.062).

An adjustment for the inclusion of both SES and the percent of residents aged 60 and older shows that the correlation coefficients of API with total mortality remained positive, although they became borderline significant in 2012 ( r = 0.18, p = 0.062) and in 2013 ( r = 0.21, p = 0.053).