The moderate (11–a25%) density group had a borderline significant association (OR = 3.17, 95% CI = 0.92–7.03, p -value = 0.061), while the low-density expression group did not show any significant association ( p -value > 0.05).
← all phrases
“borderline significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
However, the association for the richest quintile was borderline significant (OR = 1.4, 95% CI: 0.99–2.0; p = 0.061).
However, in the RT-only subgroup, this association was only borderline significant ( p = 0.061). 2.5.
A trend in increase of BMI was also observed in the control group, which was of borderline significant ( P =0.061) ( Table II ).
In addition, the number of physiotherapy consultations over the last year was borderline significant (p = 0.061), with unstandardized B = 1.7 (95% CI −0.8 to 3.6).
Among participants with low SMBG frequency, HbA1c level significantly decreased in the MMS group, resulting in a borderline significant between-group difference ( P =0.061).
This analysis showed a significant decrease of the copy number in AR ( p = 0.001) and COL22A1 ( p = 0.037) and a borderline significant increase of the copy numbers in PTEN ( p = 0.061) in the responders at the 3 month treatment (paired t-test).
In the PUFA group, delta adiponectin concentrations correlated in a borderline significant manner to delta FMD values ( r = 0.463, p= 0.061) ( Figure 4 ).
A minor difference compared to our previous analysis was the finding of a statistically significant difference between acupuncture and usual care groups at 12 months (−23.06, 95% CI −44.52 to −1.59; p=0.035), which was previously only borderline significant (−21.33, 95% CI −43.66 to 1.00; p=0.061).
Furthermore, we also identified a borderline significant association between MPA and an increased Firmicutes / Bacteroidetes (F/B) ratio ( β = 0.027, p = 0.061). 3.5 Associations with functional pathways After filtering several pathways, a total of 116 pathways were selected to examine their association with MPA and SD _change , respectively.
There was however a borderline significant ( p = 0.061) shift towards the cholic acid pathway indicated by the higher CA/(MCA+CDCA) ratio present in the BAE group (Figure 2G ).
A borderline significant relationship was found between the PCS score and FVC supine ( p = 0.061, Table 4 in the supplementary material), and, in general, the standardized coefficients for FVC upright were larger than for FVC supine.
For streamline density, a borderline significant main effect for the covariate age was found F(1, 42) = 3.702, p = 0.061, η 2 = 0.081 as well as borderline significant interactions between handedness and CC region F(6, 126) = 2.004, p = 0.070, η 2 = 0.087.
There was a borderline significant association between rs2796441 and IFG (OR = 0.587, 95%CI: 0.336–1.026), p = 0.061), as well as rs340874 and IGT (OR = 0.616, 95%CI: 0.352–1.077, p = 0.089) in the unexposed subjects. 4.
The slopes of free and total RR are borderline significant for IS ( p = 0.061) and significantly different for p CS ( p < 0.001).
Only the number of lymph nodes examined resulted in a borderline significant interaction ( p = .061), which suggests that the IM‐MS‐RT benefit may be more favorable in the subgroup of patients who have <10 axillary lymph nodes examined compared with those who have ≥10 lymph nodes examined (Figure 2 ).
Upon prolonged valinomycin treatment, GRP75 levels decreased in all cells ( PRKN wt [ p < 0.001], PRKN delEx2 [ p = 0.030], and PRKN c.1–237del , [borderline significant, p = 0.061]; see Fig 3I ).
However, the rs2043055 remained borderline significant for protection against infection by T . cruzi [P = 0.061, odds ratio (OR) = 0.71, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.49–1.02].
For BMI, the difference was borderline significant ( P = 0.061).
The C allele of rs2004776 also showed a borderline significant association (OR = 1.15, 95% CI: 0.99–1.33, p = 0.061, FDR = 0.020; Table 2 ).
The rs139185008*C heterozygote frequency decreased with age and the difference was statistically significant between the oldest and middle age group (2-sided p = 0.037) but, likely due to smaller number of individuals, only borderline significant in oldest vs. youngest age group (2-sided p = 0.061) ( Table 1 ).
Nevertheless, the time × group interaction was borderline significant ( p = 0.061) and the inclusion of a carefully matched control group (VO 2peak , age, and training volume) is considered as a major strength of the study design.
Among APOE‐ɛ4 carriers, we found a significant association between higher FW and increased rhinal tau levels (β=1.49, p=0.031), and a borderline significant association between higher FW and increased entorhinal tau (β=1.25, p=0.061).
In addition, the association for Cornell ECG-based LVH and inferior TWI was borderline significant [OR: 1.88 (95% CI: 0.97–3.63) and 2.44 (95% CI: 0.98–6.08); p -values = 0.061 and 0.056, respectively].
Meta-regression analysis showed that the association between low serum 25-OHD and mortality was affected by male gender (OR = 1.22 [1.08, 1.39], p = 0.002) ( Figure 5A ), diabetes (OR = 0.88 [0.79, 0.98], p = 0.019) ( Figure 5B ); borderline significant for age (OR = 0.93 [0.87, 1.00], p = 0.061) and hypertension (OR = 0.93 [0.87, 1.00], p = 0.052).