“borderline significant”

BMI was a borderline significant risk factor for sialolithiasis ( p = 0.06), as higher BMI was correlated to sialolith formation.

The difference by gender was borderline significant ( P = 0.06), and men reported lower CD-RISC scores than women.

LA area and LVIDD were borderline significant ( p = 0.06 and p = 0.05, respectively).

Probiotics Partly Protect against Sugar-Mediated Loss of α-Diversity Intragroup comparison of α-diversity showed a significant loss of diversity from baseline to day 14 in the placebo group with the Shannon index ( p = 0.02), which was borderline significant with the Simpson index ( p = 0.06).

The left hamstring indicated a borderline significant difference in torque production between the three testing times [F (2, 38) = 2.98, p = 0.06, partial η 2 = 0.14].

The pooled analysis revealed a borderline significant 30% increased recurrence risk for ITCs versus node-negative disease (HR 1.3, 95% CI: 1.0–1.6; p = 0.06), with remarkable consistency between St Clair et al.

The three-way interaction between sex, breeding stage and status on body condition was borderline significant (χ 2 4 = 9.05, P = 0.06).

The association between adulthood SEP and total GMV was borderline significant ( p = .06; Supplementary Table 7 ).

The difference remained significant for emotional problems ( p = 0.03), and was borderline significant for total difficulties ( p = 0.06) after adjusting for compliance ( Table 3 ).

In our study, the moderation effect of BMI (T) on the genetic component of total cholesterol and HDL-cholesterol was borderline significant ( p = 0.06 for total cholesterol, p = 0.08 for HDL-cholesterol) (Table 2 ).

In addition, borderline significant differences were shown for factors of ‘Complications’ (P = .06) and ‘ypN’ (P = .05) in PECTI group, but there was no apparent discrepancy between different PECTI subgroups by post hoc test of Chi-square partition method with adjusted α’ as a standard. 3.2 Survival analyses In survival analyses, the median follow-up was 51 months (range, 4 to 128 months).

DTNPV 1 has shown borderline significant discrimination ability between 2 models ( Table 7 ), with NRI estimate =0.028 ( P =0.06).

While findings of several previous studies showed a significant relationship between levels of job satisfaction and nurses' intention to leave their current centers, the association in this study was borderline significant (p-value= 0.06) [ 17 , 18 ].

The interactive effect of HUVEC race and experimental condition was borderline significant ( P = 0.06, Figure 2 ).

We observed a statistically significant genotype-by-sex interaction for MDM4 rs4245739 ( p = 0.01) and a borderline significant interaction for rs1563828 ( p = 0.06).

A borderline significant protective effect was observed between continuous MedHi intake and elevated BP (OR = 0.98; 95% CI, 0.95–1.00; p = 0.06).

In the East (existing motorway) area, a borderline significant (p = 0.06) interaction with chronic condition was found for mental wellbeing (MCS-8).

The risk of infant mortality was 1.54 higher than in the rest of the metropolitan area, the log likelihood ratio reduced from 12 to 8.74 and the cluster of infant mortality became borderline significant (p=0.06), indicating that the socioeconomic index explained a major part of the excess infant mortality shown by the unadjusted analysis [ 46 ].

The association between omentin-1 plasma levels and early deceleration peak was borderline significant in this analysis (β = 0.233; P = 0.06).

A positive trend for HF (coefficient=0.018, p=0.14) corresponded to a 1.9% increased relative risk per percentage point increase in PVC burden, explaining 9.1% of heterogeneity, whereas a borderline significant relationship for stroke (coefficient=0.03, p=0.06) indicated an approximate 3.1% increase, with PVC burden accounting for 100% of the variance.

59.4%), with a borderline significant difference (P=0.06).

For women, there was a borderline significant positive association between gender inequality and double burden of disease (OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.11, p=0.06), while there was no association in men (OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.04, p=0.75).

A borderline significant result was found for search engines (58% vs 51%, p = 0.060) and official webpages of health services or health organizations (16% vs. 11%, p = 0.062).

In the model of poor RBC storage quality (i.e., FVB), DLA was associated with a borderline significant improvement in 24-h PTR using fresh blood ( p = 0.06) and a statistically significant improved PTR after 6-day of storage ( p < 0.001; Figure 8C ).

A 24-month survival analysis in these herds found that ELISA-positive cattle faced a borderline significant ( P = 0.06) 18% greater hazard of being culled compared to their ELISA-negative herdmates.