“borderline significant”

Borderline significant results appeared for ‘nausea/dizziness’ ( p = 0.06) and ‘irritated eyes’ ( p = 0.09). 3.5.

In the multiple linear regression analysis the nonoperatively treated patients with a type A fracture scored better than operatively treated type A fractures; this was borderline significant (p = 0.06).

In multivariable mixed models, a borderline significant direct association was observed between urinary IsoP concentrations and CAD ( P = 0.06), whereas a significant inverse association was observed between plasma α-tocopherol concentration and CAD ( P = 0.02).

There was a difference in OS, with White women having better outcomes, although it was borderline significant (HR = 0.58; 95% CI 0.33–1.03; p = 0.06).

However, when stratified according to sex ( Table 4 ), levels of 25(OH)D showed a significant positive correlation with EFG (R = 0.39, p < 0.05) and IL-15 (R = 0.39, p < 0.05), and a borderline significant association with IFNγ (R = 0.33, p = 0.06) in male patients with COVID-19.

HbA1c showed borderline significant differences across ACR groups (p=0.06).

Self-management was associated with fewer thromboembolic events (RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.37 to 0.69, p≤0.001) and with a borderline significant reduction in all-cause mortality (RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.46 to 1.01, p=0.06) than standard care.

Depression was only borderline significant ( p = 0.06), whereas GFD adherence and quality of life did not reach statistical significance.

However, Red Meat induced a greater small intestinal tumor load (p = 0.05) than Fish, and the difference was reflected by a borderline significant increase in average tumor size (p = 0.06) ( Table 4 and Fig 1B ).

The pooled analysis revealed a borderline significant 30% increased recurrence risk for ITCs versus node-negative disease (HR 1.3, 95% CI: 1.0–1.6; p = 0.06), with remarkable consistency between St Clair et al.

FBB global SUVR differences were borderline significant, with participants from the Memory Clinic having higher SUVR (1.27 ± 0.23 vs 1.20 ± 0.10, p = 0.06).

The increase in early breastfeeding was borderline significant in intervention areas ( p =0.06), while it was statistically significant in comparison areas ( p =0.01), but the endline proportions were not statistically significantly different between intervention and comparison areas.

In addition, χ 2 test results across 4 BMI groups also revealed a borderline significant relationship ( P = .06).

In parathyroid tissue there were no difference between PH and SH for p53, Ki-67, caspase, EGFR expressions; while there were significantly difference for TGFα ( P = 0.047) and borderline significant difference for p21 ( P = 0.06) expressions.

Concomitant immunological analysis demonstrated a borderline significant elevation of plasma anti-N IgG titer in D14 versus D7 ( P = 0.06; Fig. 1 b, middle panel), while NAbs titer showed comparable upward trends ( P = 0.12; Fig. 1 b, right panel).

A borderline significant interaction between smoking status and DNMT3B − 149 genotypes on lung cancer risk was observed ( p = 0.06).

Age was identified as the only independent predictor of a positive TBUT (odds ratio = 1.05, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.01-1.08, p = 0.01), with a borderline significant association with a positive SCH-1 test (odds ratio = 1.03, 95% CI = 0.99-1.07, p = 0.06).

BCLC stage showed a borderline significant association with plasma GPC3 levels, with higher levels in stage C than in stage B (13.5 [0.0–51.8] vs. 0.0 [0.0–21.6] pg/ml; p = 0.06).

A borderline significant association was also observed with the reduction of refined products and added sugars ( p = 0.06).

We found no increased risk for other cancers, however, there was a borderline significant increased risk of prostate cancer in male patients with acromegaly (HR 2.05 (95% CI: 0.97–3.37), p = 0.060) (Table 3 ).

The age of the women has a significant effect on hydration ( p = 0.01), and topical support treatment was borderline significant, with p = 0.06.

In insulin subgroup analyses, Fiasp showed a borderline significant increase in TIR (70-180 mg/dl) [MD 1.20%, 95% CI (-0.04, 2.43), P=0.06, I2=0%], while URLi demonstrated no significant effect [MD -0.19%, 95% CI (-2.43, 2.05), P=0.87, I2=20%]; the difference between these two insulins was also not significant ( Supplementary Figure 37 ).

This gender difference was not significant, χ 2 (1, 270) = 1.49, but the reported increase in forced sex (the rates effectively doubled in 8 months) was significant for boys (McNemar’s test: p = .03), and borderline significant for girls (McNemar’s test: p = .06).

There was weak evidence that the time trends differed by gender (the test for interaction between gender and calendar time was borderline significant; p=0.06).

Teacher Report The MANCOVA performed on the teacher-report data only revealed a statistically main effect of diagnostic group [ F (4,356) = 10.15, p < .001, η 2 = 0.010] and a borderline significant effect of age group [ F (2,177) = 2.86, p = .06, η 2 = 0.003].