“borderline significant”

For the SN, there was a stronger interaction ( b = −0.03, SE = 0.01, t [89.6] = −3.47, p < 0.001) due to a borderline significant increase in contrast with age in HC ( b = 0.04, SE = 0.02, t [26] = 1.93, p = 0.06) and a significant decrease in AD ( b = −0.03, SE = 0.01, t [69.9] = −3.17, p = 0.002).

In the LOAD group the percentage MEPE positive area was higher in the tibia that had received mechanical loading compared to its contralateral left tibia as is shown in Figure 2a , the difference between the loaded tibia and the control tibia being borderline significant (1.48 ± 0.59 vs 0.92 ± 0.33; p = 0.06) After repeated mechanical loading of the right tibia for two weeks no difference in percentage MEPE positive area between the loaded tibia and the control tibia was observed (0.62 ± 0.36 vs 0.62 ± 0.33; Figure 2c ).

The overall analysis of capecitabine-based versus capecitabine-free group yielded a borderline significant result in OS (HR = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.82–1.00, p = 0.06) ( Fig. 3 ).

At baseline, β-diversity analysis revealed a borderline significant difference in the bacterial composition between the placebo and AZM groups (PERMANOVA; Bray–Curtis dissimilarity; p = 0.06).

There was a borderline significant difference in RFS between the PCb arm and the CEF‐T arm in patients whose values were above the median (Figure 2C HR = 0.26, 95% CI 0.06–1.20, p = 0.06), while the outcome of the two cohorts was similar in the rest (Figure 2D HR = 0.97, 95% CI 0.31–3.04, p = 0.96).

A borderline significant interaction was observed for insulin use among participants with type 2 diabetes (−482CT*BMI p = 0.06, −455TC*BMI p = 0.02).

Overall, there was a borderline significant excess mortality due to lung cancer (SMR = 1.08; 95% CI 1.00 to 1.18, p = 0.06).

The difference between India and Ireland was borderline significant with P = 0.06. † For managers, the difference between Eng and its counterparts was statistically significant ( P < 0.01); for teammates, t -tests comparing Eng versus PM and Corp yielded P = 0.06 and <0.01, respectively.

In the hyponatremic group, the increased mortality risk was statistically borderline significant ( p = 0.06).

We found borderline significant differences in distribution of age at LEEP (p = 0.06) and sexual activity span (p = 0.07) with CIN3 size; larger CIN3s were found in older women and women with longer sexual activity span (ptrend = 0.02).

Univariate Cox Regression Analysis In the univariate Cox regression analysis (the summary is presented in Table 3 ), the older age at onset had a higher hazard of mortality, but the result was borderline significant (HR: 1.03; 95% CI 0.99–1.07, p = 0.06).

The association with cg25390787 (located in promotor region) was only borderline significant (p = 0.06) consistently for both atherosclerosis measures.

The change between 2009 and 2011 was borderline significant (p=0.06).

However, the loss -of-function Arg-307-Glu polymorphism of P2X7R is associated with IBD, albeit the association is borderline significant (p = 0.06) from a relatively small number of cases and unaccompanied by any association between IBD and other loss- or gain-of-function polymorphisms [ 25 ].

Results: E-CAD protein expression was significantly correlated with OC histological subtype (p < 0.0001), while borderline significant correlations were observed with both tumor grade (p = 0.06) and stage (p = 0.07).

In our previous report, elevated CEA level was a borderline significant factor in skip N2 metastases in stage IA NSCLCs ( p = 0.06) [ 24 ].

There was, however, a statistically significant increase following AA treatment in spare capacity ( Figure 5 H; χ 2 = 8.03, p = 0.045) and a borderline significant increase in maximal respiration ( Figure 5 F; χ 2 = 7.44, p = 0.06) in 5xFAD male mice.

Marital status (married and cohabiting compared with divorced or separated and single or widowed) had only a borderline significant association (Pearson Chi-squared test, p = 0.06) with whether one parent had used alienating behaviour toward the other.

The difference in rates of change between the two groups was only borderline significant (P=0.06).

However, the trends in the nonlinear relationship were attenuated when subjects were divided according to PI at 120 min (Figure 3 A), although borderline significant was observed between lean subjects and obese subjects (two-way ANOVA, P = 0.06, Figure 3 B).

Our findings indicate that hopelessness about the future, worrying and restlessness both have significant high out‐strength, in addition to low acceptance for undesired qualities which had borderline significant out‐strength ( p = 0.06).

Females in the inadequate plasma vitamin C group displayed a borderline significant higher mean zinc supplementation dose ( P = 0.06) and mean serum vitamin B-12 concentrations ( P = 0.07) than males.

Although the RYGB patients in this study did lose more weight, the difference was only borderline significant (p = 0.06, S3 Table in S2 File ) and no conclusions can be drawn about the greater efficacy of either surgery in weight loss within the study timeframe.

Declines in hsCRP between the colchicine-only and colchicine+XOI assessments were borderline significant ( p = 0.06).

Although borderline significant (p=0.06), A. soehngenii L2-7 infusion augmented the postprandial excursions of secondary BA ( figure 3D ).