Barely Significant
← all phrases

“borderline significant”

11,410 sentences · 11,410 papers · 14,072 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

borderline significantP =0.061.2× alphagold
Meanwhile, compared with model 1, model 2 showed a borderline significant improved classification performance of a critically ill condition (AUC and 95% CI for model 1: 0.673, 0.592-0.754; for model 2: 0.725, 0.645-0.804; P =0.06 for difference) ( Figure S1 ).
borderline significantp = 0.061.2× alphagold
From the statistical analysis, it can be seen that there was a significant difference in response time between individuals with different empathy abilities for different types of conflicting offers, F (1, 21) = 5.76, p < 0.05, with the response time of the high-empathy group being longer than that of the low-empathy group; the main effect of offer type was borderline significant, F (1, 21) = 3.93, p = 0.06, response time under non-conflicting proposals is slightly longer than that under conflicting offers; the interaction between the group and proposal types was not significant, F (1, 21) = 0.001, p > 0.05.
borderline significantp = 0.061.2× alphagold
PTH and ABL significantly increased femoral areal bone mineral density (aBMD) (borderline significant p = 0.06 for PTH), femoral mid-diaphyseal bone strength, femoral metaphyseal and epiphyseal and vertebral bone volume fraction (BV/TV), connectivity density, volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD), and bone formation rate (BFR/BS) compared to Ctrl.
Teriparatide and Abaloparatide Have a Similar Effect on Bone in Mice.
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) · 2021 · PMC8092394
borderline significantp = 0.061.2× alphagold
The other major change in prophylaxis has been the addition of PTCY ( 11 , 12 , 16 ) but only for patients receiving a haploidentical transplant: It is rather surprising that, despite mismatched family grafts have a higher risk of GvHD grades II–IV and III–IV, PTCY shows a borderline significant protective effect of 0.71 ( p = 0.06).
borderline significantp = .061.2× alphagold
3 RESULTS The progression from a transoral to a transfacial approach for stone removal at the time of the first surgical treatment was associated with a more proximal stone location ( p = .02) with borderline significant association with larger stone volume ( p = .06) and sialolith greatest dimension ( p = .08) (Table 1 ).
Parotid sialolithiasis - Long term follow-up analyzing surgical approaches.
Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol · 2024 · PMC11541602
borderline significantp = 0.061.2× alphagold
In the LOAD group the percentage MEPE positive area was higher in the tibia that had received mechanical loading compared to its contralateral left tibia as is shown in Figure 2a , the difference between the loaded tibia and the control tibia being borderline significant (1.48 ± 0.59 vs 0.92 ± 0.33; p = 0.06) After repeated mechanical loading of the right tibia for two weeks no difference in percentage MEPE positive area between the loaded tibia and the control tibia was observed (0.62 ± 0.36 vs 0.62 ± 0.33; Figure 2c ).
borderline significantp = 0.061.2× alphagold
In separate models with log transformed adduct and metabolite values as the exposure variables, the direction and significance of the associations between adducts and outcomes were the same as the models with the dichotomized exposure with the exception of the CBCL DSM-oriented attention deficit hyperactivity scale raw score and CPRS DSM-IV Total scale raw score, which became borderline significant (p = 0.06, and p = 0.08, respectively) (data not shown).