Barely Significant
← all phrases

“borderline significant”

11,410 sentences · 11,410 papers · 14,072 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

borderline significantP = 0.0370.7× alphagold
Sex-specific analyses revealed non-significant heterogeneity (P-interaction = 0.412), though point estimates suggested potential differences, with males showing borderline significant association (OR = 1.35, 95% CI: 1.02–1.79, P = 0.037; 3.8% prevalence) compared to non-significant effects in females (OR = 1.24, 95% CI: 0.94–1.64, P = 0.129; 3.2% prevalence).
borderline significantp = 0.0370.7× alphagold
There was a significant (or borderline significant) and positive effect of vaccination for rcMBCs (β = 0.190, 95% CI 0.011–0.368, p = 0.037) (Fig. 5 ) at D11, and for active naïve-PD1 + (β = 0.637, 95% CI 0.058 to 1.217, p = 0.031) (Fig. 5 ), acMBC-IgG + (β = 0.166, 95%CI − 0.025 to 0.358, p = 0.088) and PCGCs (β = 0.874, 95%CI − 0.137 to 1.884, p = 0.090) at D84.
borderline significantP = 0.0390.8× alphagold
Decomposing PI impairments In contrast to the third “no distal cues” condition, performance differences between baseline and “no optic flow” conditions (return condition two) were borderline significant for hereditary but not physiological risk factors (two‐way FH x APOE ε4 F 1,77 = 4.42, P = 0.039; post hoc pairwise tests all P Tukey > 0.138; Figure 1E ), indicating that the PI impairment observed across all AD risk groups related specifically to orientation cue removal.