“borderline significant”

The analysis also showed a borderline significant correlation between the CV of triplicate ddPCR results and the fraction of total positive droplets (Spearman Rank correlation=-0.4417 with permutation test P=0.0306).

None of the outcomes of TMT were found to have group × time interactions except for the TMT-B (a borderline significant p = 0.032).

In contrast, the small increase (4%) in IGFBP3 levels was borderline significant in men and women ( P = 0.032).

The tendency was rather weak and borderline significant (within whiplash group, correlation r = 0.016 (p = 0.032) between time since whiplash and somatic symptoms (Figure 2 )).

There was a borderline significant difference in the FeHV-1 ( p = 0.032) and Mycoplasma spp.

We also noticed that HAS3 expression was also elevated (1.5-fold increase) in grade 1 malignant tumors compared to normal endometrium, this finding being borderline significant (p = 0.033) (figure 1B ).

A marginal violation was noted for lactate in the ICU mortality model (p = 0.028), with a borderline significant global test (p = 0.033).

However, in AET patients Spearman’s rank correlation analyses observed significant or borderline significant correlations between PRS-OPC and the volume change in left CA4 (S = 66, P-value = 0.033, rho = -0.89, 95% CI [-0.99, -0.26]) and left DG (S = 64, P-value = 0.058, rho = -0.83, 95% CI [-0.98, -0.05]) (Fig. 1 A and 1 B).

Contrastingly, ASM, while borderline significant (β = 0.25, p = 0.034), was the weakest predictor among the three.

MET-min/week, as a parameter reflecting physical activity, showed a borderline significant effect on FF (P=0.034), but this effect was only observed for one muscle (ES) and only when considering the logarithmic value of this parameter.

Time post-infection showed borderline significant association with %T1-shortening in the thalamus and putamen (LMM, p = 0.034 and 0.033, respectively) (Fig. 2d ).

cPP was not related to BMI ( R =0.265; P =0.0.58), but had a borderline significant correlation with height Z‐score ( R =0.295; P =0.034).

rs12654812 ( RGS14 ) also revealed a borderline significant difference in its allelic distribution ( p = 0.0346).

The NEBL rs2359536 and PCDH15 rs10763170 variants were not associated with the overall risk for the disease, although a borderline significant association was observed between the PCDH15 rs10763170 minor allele (T allele) and somatotrophinomas (dominant model, OR 1.55, 95% CI 1.02–2.35, p = 0.035).

The PERMANOVA results showed that salinity accounted for 22% of the variance in MVOC emissions ( P < 0.01), while growth phase was borderline significant ( P = 0.035) and explained 20% of the variance.

First, the statistical outcome was only borderline significant (HR 1.31, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.67; p = 0.035), with a broad 95% confidence interval that approached 1 in the lower limit, suggesting that the findings have to be interpreted with caution.

Although borderline significant (p = 0.035–0.037) evidence for association was observed at rs1547651 and rs3025035 in the non-TOF CVM patients, this seems unlikely to reflect true association when multiple comparisons are taken into account.

Both associations remained significant or borderline significant when controlled for age, gender and initial WBC count (logistic regression, p = 0.036 and p = 0.052, respectively) ( Tables 2 and 3 ).

Here, a borderline significant negative correlation ( p = 0.0360) was observed between the fold change decrease in NRON and the TTVR ( Figure 3 B), suggesting that the drop in NRON expression might have some value in predicting the time to viral rebound.

Associations between PFAS concentrations and hypertension In continuous models (Table 2 ), PFOA was associated with higher odds of hypertension in all models and remained borderline significant after full adjustment (OR, 1.04, 95% CI, 1.00–1.08, P = .036).

This difference was borderline significant ( p = .036).

Second, with respect to diarrhea severity, the observed difference in the Shannon index between the G0–G1 and G2–G3 groups was borderline significant ( p = 0.0367).

Beta Diversity Analysis Treatment grouping/phase was found to be significant in regard to grouping across PCA dimension one ( p = 0.001) and to be significant/borderline significant in regard to dispersion across PCA dimensions one to three ( p = 0.0368, 0.0416, and 0.0624, respectively).

Among cerebellar regions, only the vermis IX–X volume showed a borderline significant negative correlation with attack frequency (ρ = −0.29, p = 0.037, q = 0.078).

Sex-specific analyses revealed non-significant heterogeneity (P-interaction = 0.412), though point estimates suggested potential differences, with males showing borderline significant association (OR = 1.35, 95% CI: 1.02–1.79, P = 0.037; 3.8% prevalence) compared to non-significant effects in females (OR = 1.24, 95% CI: 0.94–1.64, P = 0.129; 3.2% prevalence).