“borderline significant”

The association between TL and kidney function remained robust even after adjusting for potential confounding factors, but the association between TL and ACR was only borderline significant (β-coefficient= -0.012, p =0.056).

5 Limitations The atorvastatin-only treatment arm had a slight, borderline significant reduction in the 9-protein risk score at 3 months from baseline (0.43% absolute risk reduction, P =0.056), when perhaps no effect would have been expected.

There were more CD11b-positive cells in the S+P day 1 group (23±6 cells) than in the PRK day 1 group (18±2 cells), but the difference was borderline significant ( p = 0.056).

Specifically, miR-330-5p had the highest module membership value (0.816) and it showed a borderline significant association with total arterial compliance index ( p -value = 0.056).

Although pathological stage and perineural invasion showed a borderline significant relationship with DFS, these relationships did not reach statistical significance ( p = 0.056 and p = 0.059, respectively).

The association remained borderline significant when HOMA-IR was included in the analyses ( p = 0.056).

Statistical analysis showed only a borderline significant difference between these two groups of patients ( p = 0.056).

Joint associations of RC and hs-CRP with risk of coronary heart disease When using the cut-points of 1.00 mmol/L for RC and 2.00 mg/L for hs-CRP to define elevated RC and hs-CRP, their interactions were borderline significant for CHD ( P = 0.056) and significant for MI ( P = 0.007).

In addition to pCR, there were another four factors with borderline significant influence, which were achievement of clinical CR ( p = 0.056), age ( p = 0.046), smoking history ( p = 0.048), and existence of distant metastases at presentation ( p = 0.041).

Kaplan–Meier analysis showed significantly poorer survival ( p < 0.001) in dogs with a high Ki67 PI (≥ 18%), whereas the composite score showed a borderline significant association with outcome in Cox regression ( p = 0.056; hazard ratio 2.80).

However, when adjusted for ABSI, FIB-4’s effect size decreased and became borderline significant (OR = 1.455, p = 0.056), indicating that its predictive role is secondary to burn severity.

However, we observed a borderline significant difference when comparing ICI monotherapy with dual/combination strategies (p-value = 0.056) in favor of the latest.

037 ), while C1M was only borderline significant ( p = 0 . 056 ).

Although only FEV 1 (% predicted) revealed significant difference between PP and TP, FVC (% predicted) showed borderline significant differences ( p = 0.056).

Only one gene showed a differential reaction after exposure to LDIR: Comparing N2+ and N0, Calmodulin binding transcription activator 2 ( CAMTA2 ) was upregulated with a borderline significant p -value [LFC: 0.101, p -value = 0.056 (crude model)] after LDIR (Table 2 ).

Craniotomy size was not significant regarding GTR (p = 0.178), and GTR rate had a borderline significant correlation with tumor volume (p = 0.056); in the case of vestibular schwannomas, size of craniotomy was important for GTR (p = 0.041).

Tumor size was borderline significant ( p = 0.056), and patients with early stage tumors tended to have a longer time to progression.

Women had slightly more meningiomas, but because of small numbers, the difference was only borderline significant (1.0 vs. 0.4%, p = 0.056).

In this model, infection remained borderline significant (OR 1.80; 95% CI 0.98–3.30; p = 0.056), whereas cancer and malnutrition were not statistically significant.

High POSTN expression alone showed a borderline significant correlation with unfavorable PFS (log-rank p=0.056).

One borderline significant correlation was observed: agreeableness was correlated with how often participants play computer games (ρ = −0.50, p = 0.056).

Moreover, a borderline significant interaction between intention and block ( F 2.2,61.7 = 2.96, p = .056, η p 2 = .09) was driven by significantly better performance with implementation intentions compared with goal intentions on the first block-set ( F 1,29 = 6.27, p = .02, η p 2 = .18)—an effect that was absent in the later training block-sets (all p > .16, F < 2.0).

24.27 kg/m 2 , p = 0.056, borderline significant) and higher triglycerides (1. 56 vs. 1. 23 mmol/L, p = 0.055, borderline significant), and the AHI and ODI were more severe, the mean SPO2 and LSPO2 were lower, and the proportion of T90 was greater (all p < 0.01).

However, for one of the measures, the reciprocal mean reaction time (mean 1/RT), the difference was borderline significant ( P = 0.056), indicating a slight improvement in performance after the fourth night shift compared with after the third.

This proportion significantly increased over time (2008: 3.7%, 2012: 6.8%, p=0.014) and was higher among those of non-Dutch ethnicity, although borderline significant (Dutch: 4.4%, non-Dutch: 6.9%, p=0.056).