“borderline significant”

Treatment group was borderline significant (p = 0.055) for VAS, with final adjusted active rehabilitation mean score 15.8 higher than manual therapy (95% CI -6.0 to 37.5).

The multivariate analysis did not identify any statistically significant factors, but the association between pSUVmax and DFS was borderline significant ( p = 0.055).

The MS spinal cord CSA was lower than control by between 19% and 24%, quite small proportional variation between cord levels; however, there was borderline significant evidence, P = 0.055, of variation in absolute differences by region, with the largest absolute loss in the cervical region (Figure 5 A). aCST was decreased in the MS spinal cord by between 25% and 37% (Table 2 ).

Similarly, ph-STAT3 tumour cell expression was not associated with patient age, tumour size and Her-2 status, though borderline significant associations with reduced LVI ( P =0.055) and BVI ( P =0.052) were observed.

The block containing rs729749 is borderline significant in the nonstratified analysis ( P = 0.055), but excluding rs2284027 and rs17811059 yields a significant association (empirical P = 0.04 in all and 0.03 in men; Table 5 ).

VD generally decreased from baseline to month 6, but statistically significant differences were observed only for the nasal sector, with a 2.9% decrease ( p = 0.001) and a small, borderline significant decrease in overall mean VD in the DCP of 1.1% ( p = 0.055) ( Table 2 ).

There was a borderline significant association between app use and decreased incidence of low birth weight ( p = 0.055).

A history of hemodialysis was found to have a borderline significant association with bladder recurrence in our cohort (multivariate analysis, HR: 1.791, P = 0.055).

The Patient Expectation Index showed a borderline significant correlation with the IFDFW-6 ( r = 0.086, P = 0.055).

[ 85 ] reported that there was a borderline significant difference in patients with diabetic and non-diabetic nephropathy ( p = 0.055).

Further at week 10, a borderline significant change was found in extension force steadiness ( p =0.055), and a significant reduction was observed at week 22 ( p =0.011).

Note that this interaction remained borderline significant even after incorporating gender into the statistical model ( F (1, 46) = 3.89, P = 0.055, η 2 partial = 0.08).

Notably, differences in 90-day mRS across treatments were statistically significant in the low-risk group ( p < 0.001), borderline significant in the moderate-risk group ( p = 0.055), and not significant in the high-risk group ( p = 0.157).

4 reported a significant difference in the morphological type of SP between genders, and a borderline significant difference was noted in the present study ( P = 0.055); in contrast, Öztunç et al. 19 demonstrated no significant difference.

Further stratifying the cancer diagnoses to subpopulations of cancer types, breast cancer was shown to be significantly associated with low LVEF (OR 1.39 (95% CI 1.18 to 1.64), p<0.001), whereas the association between blood-related cancer and low LVEF was borderline significant (PR 1.18 (95% CI 0.99 to 1.39), p=0.055).

The SPRM group reported lower scores both in the total DRSP and the subscales during treatment, compared with placebo, although irritability was only borderline significant ( p = 0.055) (Fig. 1 ).

This difference is borderline significant (P=0.055).

Furthermore, a borderline significant interaction between maintenance treatment and HDT ( p = 0.055) was observed. 2.4.

Higher sitting time at work showed a borderline significant association (p=0.055) with higher overall pain intensity, as indicated by the main effect of sitting on pain in the fully adjusted model, but this trend was not present in the crude model or when adjustments for individual factors were made (model 2).

Sex was associated with a borderline significant (p=0.055) 45% increase in the odds of RVF seropositivity following adjustment for age and ethnicity.

We found that uncorrectable VI—caused by pathological conditions—was associated with a significant reduction in health utility, as measured by the TTO instrument (disutility of 0.052, p = 0.041), and a borderline significant reduction when measured by the EQ-5D-5 L (disutility of 0.047, p = 0.055), after adjustment for socio-demographic factors and chronic disease history.

Similarly, RA patients in the active counselling group showed a borderline significant decline in DAS28 (β = −0.6 (−1.3 to 0), p = 0.055), while this trend was not significant in the control group (β = −0.4 (−0.9 to 0.14), p = 0.17).

However, in this beetle, the only difference found in the contrast tests corresponds to 70% ethanol (t = 6.64, df = 596, p < 0.001), although it is important to note that Bs was borderline significant (t = 3.00, df = 596, p = 0.055). 3.2.

In the correlation analysis of the high MD group, it was found that only the PSD of 10-2 uniquely presented borderline significant correlations with GCIPL thickness (r = −0.327, p = 0.055), and no other functional parameter showed significant correlation.

In boys this association was significant and in girls the association was borderline significant ( p = 0.055).