“borderline significant”

[ 85 ] reported that there was a borderline significant difference in patients with diabetic and non-diabetic nephropathy ( p = 0.055).

There was a borderline significant association between app use and decreased incidence of low birth weight ( p = 0.055).

Ethnicity was significantly different (FDR corrected p-value = 0.004) between the two clusters and sex was borderline significant (FDR corrected p-value = 0.055 and uncorrected p-value = 0.006), with cluster 2 having more white and female participants.

American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) IV classification had a borderline significant association with operative time ( β = 100.4, 95% CI: −2.05, 202.9; p = 0.055).

When symbolic responses from the two Single conditions were summed and compared to these responses from the two Multiple conditions, a paired t -test revealed a borderline significant difference, t (15) = 2.1, p = 0.055, d = 0.42 (Multiple > Single).

Publication bias Assessment of publication bias in the comparison of observation versus adjuvant treatment involved visual inspection of the funnel plot, which indicated asymmetry ( Figure 6 ), and Egger’s regression test, which showed a borderline significant result ( t = 2.38, P = 0.055).

4a ), also seen as a tendency of increased PI3K signature score (although only borderline significant p = 0.055; Fig. 4c ).

In the correlation analysis of the high MD group, it was found that only the PSD of 10-2 uniquely presented borderline significant correlations with GCIPL thickness (r = −0.327, p = 0.055), and no other functional parameter showed significant correlation.

Although there was not an overall interaction effect between week number and excessive exercise for changes in SCL-5 score, post-hoc tests showed that there was a borderline significant interaction effect in week 9 vs. 10 ( F = 3.80, p = .055, ES = .04), and significant interaction effect in week 10 vs. 11 ( F = 7.26, p = .009, ES = .08) (Fig. 2a ).

This difference is borderline significant (P=0.055).

Weekly MVPA time (≥150 minutes versus <150 minutes) exhibited a borderline significant inverse association with low handgrip strength (OR = 0.395, p = .055).

Prognostic Risk Factors In univariate Cox models of other prognostic risk factors, OS was positively associated with MGMT methylation (hazard ratio [HR] 0.490 [CI: 0.314–0.765], P = .002 [.005]) and borderline significant negatively associated with steroid use (HR 1.562 [CI: 0.991–2.463], P = .055 [.093]), but not with PS (HR 1.284 [CI: 0.841–1.959], P = .247 [.344]), age (HR 0.992 [CI: 0.969–1.107], P = .528 [.638]), an a priori diagnosis of progression (HR 1.304 [CI: 0.845–2.012], P = .230 [.332]), or prior biopsy only (HR 0.53 [CI: 0.263–1.062], P = .073 [.119]).

Marital status showed that unmarried individuals had increased odds (OR 1.785, 95% CI 0.988 to 3.222), but the association was borderline significant (p=0.055).

Findings were consistent when limiting the analysis to children of European descent, although the additive model for rs1800497 was not statistically significant ( p = 0.097) and the dominant model for rs1800497 was borderline significant ( p = 0.055) in this subset (Supplementary Table 1).

Hypothyroidism showed a borderline significant association with high serum ferritin levels in TM patients (P=0.055).

Interestingly, the bodily pain domain showed borderline significant ( p = 0.055) reduction of pain score at second year of treatment.

A significant model has emerged with a highly significant effect for p21 (p<0.001) and a borderline significant effect for hif1α (p = 0.055), implying that, given the information on p21, there is not much additional information from determining hif1α.

Perceptual priming resulted in a significant difference in the mean RMSE for the wheat ranking test, (paired t-test p = 0.038), and in a borderline significant effect for the second rocket lettuce ranking test (p = 0.055).

Calculation of AUC values indicated that only hs-cTnI levels at 12 hours had significant discriminatory ability (P = 0.013), although CK-MB levels at 12 hours were borderline significant (P = 0.055).

Of the chemokine receptors tested, only CCR6 showed borderline significant correlation with CCL18 (p = 0.055); its expression was highly correlated with T-cell presence.

For SNR, the difference at the 2 electrode locations was not significant [ F (1,70) = 0.112; p = 0.738], the difference between age groups was not significant [ F (1,70) = 1.83; p = 0.180], the difference between the stimuli was borderline significant [ F (2,140) = 2.96; p = 0.055] and there were no significant interactions.

Interactions With Race and Gestational Age The interaction of high SES with race was borderline significant for 1‐year mortality ( P =0.055).

Although borderline significant in terms of developmental arrest, a clear and reproducible sensitivity was caused by the brc-1(tm1145) ( P -value = 0.055) and exo-1(tm1842) ( P -value = 0.018) alleles.

These findings were confirmed in univariate Cox regression analysis using a dichotomised variable of low (0–2) and high (3–4) PODXL expression (HR=1.98; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.38–2.84, P <0.001 for CSS and HR=1.85; 95% CI 1.29–2.64, P =0.001 for 5-year OS), and remained significant for 5-year OS in multivariate analysis (HR=1.52; 95% CI 1.03–2.25, P <0.036) and borderline significant for CSS (HR=1.57; 95% CI 0.99–2.18, P =0.055), adjusted for age, gender, TNM status, differentiation grade and vascular invasion ( Table 2 ).

The MS spinal cord CSA was lower than control by between 19% and 24%, quite small proportional variation between cord levels; however, there was borderline significant evidence, P = 0.055, of variation in absolute differences by region, with the largest absolute loss in the cervical region (Figure 5 A). aCST was decreased in the MS spinal cord by between 25% and 37% (Table 2 ).